Context Matters: GIS-Based Spatial Analysis of the Nasca Geoglyphs of Palpa

Abstract

In this chapter we report on the GIS-based analysis of the Nasca geoglyphs of Palpa, Peru, undertaken in the course of the Nasca-Palpa Archaeological Project. We focus here on the analysis of spatial relationships between the geoglyphs and the surrounding landscape in terms of visibility and orientation. Our motivation for this contextual analysis was to gain a better understanding of the function and meaning of the geoglyphs by virtually assuming the viewpoints of the people who conceived, built, and used the geoglyphs between approximately 400 BC and 800 AD. In this sense our study of geoglyph visibility and orientation is a contribution to current attempts to incorporate cultural variables into the quantitative environment of GIS, thereby rendering GIS a more useful instrument for archaeological research. This approach required the development of new GIS tools tailored to the specific needs of archaeological analysis. The results of our study indicate that the geoglyphs can be understood as stages for public rites performed by social groups, whereas the incorporation of the surrounding landscape through visual links was apparently not a major concern. 19.1 GIS Applications in Archaeology: Chances and Limitations Geographical information systems (GIS) have become a widespread tool in archaeological research due to their manifold capabilities in terms of data capture, management, analysis, and visualisation (Wheatley and Gillings 2002; Conolly and Lake 2006). Because of their origin in cartography and geography, GIS are especially well suited for archaeological investigations at a regional scale, be they more traditional studies of settlement patterns or recent approaches to landscape archaeology. However, as GIS were not originally

Multisensory Experiences in Archaeological Landscapes—Sound, Vision, and Movement in GIS and Virtual Reality

“…While archaeologists have carried out many visibility analyses using GIS (e.g. Doyle et al 2012;Howey and Burg 2017;Kosiba and Bauer 2013;Lake and Woodman 2003;Lambers and Sauerbier 2006;Richards-Rissetto 2010, 2017aWernke et al 2017;Wheatley 1995), they are only recently performing acoustic analyses (e.g. Goodwin and Richards-Rissetto 2020;Lake 2013;Primeau 2022;Primeau and Witt 2018;Witt and Primeau 2019;Zalaquett 2010;Zalaquett Rock 2015).…”