2011
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2011.614170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Dependent Emotion Regulation: Suppression and Reappraisal at the Burning Man Festival

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Values on individual items were transformed to percent of maximum possible scores, which range from 0 to 100. Thus, percent of maximum possible scores (POMP transformation) for suppression and reappraisal were computed for each participant (Cohen, Cohen, Aiken, & West, 1999; McRae, Heller, John, & Gross, 2011) and then exponent transformed to account for non-normality of the data. All but two participants completed the ERQ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Values on individual items were transformed to percent of maximum possible scores, which range from 0 to 100. Thus, percent of maximum possible scores (POMP transformation) for suppression and reappraisal were computed for each participant (Cohen, Cohen, Aiken, & West, 1999; McRae, Heller, John, & Gross, 2011) and then exponent transformed to account for non-normality of the data. All but two participants completed the ERQ.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, suppression use has been shown to increase when people enter an unfamiliar social environment, namely, upon transitioning to college (Srivastava et al 2009). Interestingly, not all novel social contexts lead to increases in suppression use: McRae et al (2011) found that suppression use decreased when people were at Burning Man, a social gathering that encourages creativity and open expression. These findings are consistent with the idea that the extent to which individuals use suppression is in part due to their level of comfort in expressing their emotions in the current social context (i.e., suppression is used in situations where people are more uncomfortable).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence suggests that having a range of strategies is important because some strategies are more helpful in particular situations than others and there is no one strategy that works always. For example, aggregated evidence suggests that suppression is cognitively and socially costly (Butler et al, 2003;Gross, 2002;Srivastava, Tamir, McGonigal, John, & Gross, 2009), while reappraisal can be helpful in particular situations because the individual is deeply processing information (Gross & John, 2003;Mauss, Cook, Cheng, & Gross, 2007;McRae, Heller, John, & Gross, 2011;Richards & Gross, 2000). However, which strategy is preferentially engaged switches from predominantly reappraisal at the lower emotion intensity to predominantly distraction at the higher intensity (Sheppes, Scheibe, Suri, & Gross, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%