2012 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ucc.2012.33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context-Aware Job Scheduling for Cloud Computing Environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the used algorithms include FIFO, priority-based, deadline-driven, hybrid approaches that use backfilling techniques [15], among others [16,17]. In addition to priorities and deadlines, other factors have been considered, such as fairness [18], energy-consumption [19], and context-awareness [9]. Moreover, utility functions were used to model how the importance of results to users varies over time [20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of the used algorithms include FIFO, priority-based, deadline-driven, hybrid approaches that use backfilling techniques [15], among others [16,17]. In addition to priorities and deadlines, other factors have been considered, such as fairness [18], energy-consumption [19], and context-awareness [9]. Moreover, utility functions were used to model how the importance of results to users varies over time [20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, in a society where human attention is increasingly becoming scarce, and where users perform multiple concurrent activities [4] 1 and use multiple devices [5], 2 response time might not be the sole element defining the perceptions endusers have from a service's QoS. Our previous work investigated how application instrumentation [6][7][8], and end-user context and profiling [9] could be used in the collection of honest signals determining how clients interact with a service provider and what their levels of patience are when making requests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other efforts made in literature in these areas of resource scheduling include: Greedy Particle Swarm Optimization (GPSO) [39], Task Length and User Priority (ie. Credit Based Scheduling Algorithm) [40], Cost based scheduling [41], Energy efficient optimization methods [42], Activity based costing [43], [44], Reliability Factor Based [45], Context aware scheduling [46],Dynamic slot based scheduling [47], [48], Multi-Objective Tasks Scheduling Algorithm [49], Public Cloud Scheduling Algorithm with Load Balancing [50], Agent-based elastic Cloud bag-of-tasks concurrent scheduling [51], Analytic hierarchy process (task scheduling and resource allocation) [52], Swarm scheduling [53], Profitdriven scheduling [54], Dynamic trusted scheduling [55], Community-aware scheduling algorithm [56], Adaptive energy-efficient scheduling [57], grid, cloud and workflow scheduling [58]. In these algorithms, job/task length and priority are mostly the parameters analyzed.…”
Section: B Related Research Effortsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These jobs are distributed based on several techniques for job scheduling proposed in the literature, such as those found in [24] [25] [26] [27]. However, the job distribution may still lead to overwhelming of resources at a VM.…”
Section: B Job Schedulermentioning
confidence: 99%