2006 Pervasive Health Conference and Workshops 2006
DOI: 10.1109/pcthealth.2006.361657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context aware inactivity recognition for visual fall detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The proposed strategy may consider additional tasks and responsibilities like reliable and quick human fall detection (Jansen and Deklerck, 2007). Furthermore, the ability to detect, track, and identify wheelchair and pets may also be required.…”
Section: Requirement Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The proposed strategy may consider additional tasks and responsibilities like reliable and quick human fall detection (Jansen and Deklerck, 2007). Furthermore, the ability to detect, track, and identify wheelchair and pets may also be required.…”
Section: Requirement Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these environments may benefit from the use of CHROMUBE. Some examples of environments with heterogeneous sensors are cameras [22,16], wearable sensors [20], unobstrusive sensors (i.e. presence, open door, pressure sensors) [14,25], sensors integrated in mobile phones or PDAs [29,40], etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning the second concept class of off-body video monitoring, while limb recognition has demonstrated a high degree of accuracy [7,36,37,47,49,50,54], despite a somewhat lack of experimental validation specifically for athome fall detection applications [47]. Aside from computing power considerations surrounding video processing which would require off-body equipment [49], limb recognition using video feeds has been dismissed time after time due to privacy issues surrounding the continuous video recording of the patient [55,56]; studies based on such a system have been rejected even by focus groups due to being too intrusive.…”
Section: Off-body Fall Detection Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%