2014
DOI: 10.1108/jhom-07-2012-0129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context and the leadership experiences and perceptions of professionals

Abstract: Observing nursing leadership through the lens of Jepson's model of contextual dynamics confirms that this is an important way of exploring how leadership is enacted. The authors found, however, the model also provided a useful frame for considering the experience and understanding of leadership by those to be led.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(71 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nurses and nurse leaders were frequently pulled between managerial claims for authority and those of doctors based on their professional expertise and jurisdiction (Jefferson et al, 2012). Consequently, they struggled to sustain whatever influence they exercised against competing perceptions and entrenched ways of thinking about leadership.…”
Section: Stakeholder Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nurses and nurse leaders were frequently pulled between managerial claims for authority and those of doctors based on their professional expertise and jurisdiction (Jefferson et al, 2012). Consequently, they struggled to sustain whatever influence they exercised against competing perceptions and entrenched ways of thinking about leadership.…”
Section: Stakeholder Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As prescribed by the literature, the trust dimension aggregates attributes related to the leadership’s ability to easily dialogue, give support for the accomplishments of activities, show concern for the team’s welfare in the work environment, allow participation in hospital decision-making and respect individual rights (Bowie, 2000; Park and Kim, 2009; Tuan, 2015; Freire and Azevedo, 2015; Udod et al (2017). Trust in hospital leaders had already been deemed important to nursing professionals in previous studies carried out by Sellgren et al (2007), Hayes et al (2010), Huang et al (2010), Siqueira and Kurcgant (2012), Jefferson et al (2014), Freire and Azevedo (2015), Chiarini and Baccarani (2016), Robson and Robson (2016), Udod et al (2017), among others. On the other hand, the attributes related to role clarity, which was believed to be part of the trust dimension as stated in the literature (Cortese et al , 2010; Lu et al , 2012, Mun et al , 2015), constituted a distinct dimension designated role clarity containing items related to the absence of ambiguity as far as what management expects from the work performed by nursing professionals.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Managerialist' systems and structures, labelled 'New Public Management', were introduced to more effectively govern the public sector (Calnan and Gabe 2001;O'Reilly and Reed, 2010). These reforms took place within the context of financial crises, increasing healthcare demands, and an ageing nurse workforce (Hassard, et al, 2017;Buchan et al, 2013), with retention problems and skill shortages amongst existing nursing professionals (Jefferson et al, 2014).…”
Section: New Public Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%