Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2766462.2767709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Context- and Content-aware Embeddings for Query Rewriting in Sponsored Search

Abstract: Search engines represent one of the most popular web services, visited by more than 85% of internet users on a daily basis. Advertisers are interested in making use of this vast business potential, as very clear intent signal communicated through an issued query allows effective targeting of users. This idea is embodied in a sponsored search model, where each advertiser maintains a list of keywords they deem indicative of increased user response rate with regards to their business. According to this targeting … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We saw word2vec enter wider adoption in IR research (e.g., Ganguly et al 2015;Grbovic et al 2015a;Kenter and de Rijke 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015;Zuccon et al 2015), as well as a flourishing of neural IR work appearing at SIGIR (Ganguly et al 2015;Grbovic et al 2015b;Mitra 2015;Severyn and Moschitti 2015;Vulic and Moens 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015), spanning ad-hoc search (Ganguly et al 2015;Vulic and Moens 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015;Zuccon et al 2015), QA sentence selection and Twitter reranking (Kenter and de Rijke 2015), cross-lingual IR (Vulic and Moens 2015), paraphrase detection (Kenter and de Rijke 2015), query completion (Mitra 2015), query suggestion (Sordoni et al 2015), and sponsored search (Grbovic et al 2015a, b). In 2015, we also saw the first workshop on Neural IR.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Neural Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We saw word2vec enter wider adoption in IR research (e.g., Ganguly et al 2015;Grbovic et al 2015a;Kenter and de Rijke 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015;Zuccon et al 2015), as well as a flourishing of neural IR work appearing at SIGIR (Ganguly et al 2015;Grbovic et al 2015b;Mitra 2015;Severyn and Moschitti 2015;Vulic and Moens 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015), spanning ad-hoc search (Ganguly et al 2015;Vulic and Moens 2015;Zheng and Callan 2015;Zuccon et al 2015), QA sentence selection and Twitter reranking (Kenter and de Rijke 2015), cross-lingual IR (Vulic and Moens 2015), paraphrase detection (Kenter and de Rijke 2015), query completion (Mitra 2015), query suggestion (Sordoni et al 2015), and sponsored search (Grbovic et al 2015a, b). In 2015, we also saw the first workshop on Neural IR.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Neural Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the content, temporal context is useful for defining TTU contexts. For instance, the context of the query can be defined by other queries in the same session (Grbovic et al 2015b). Finally, the context of a document is defined by joining its content and the neighboring documents in a document stream in Djuric et al (2015).…”
Section: Learnmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous work adopting semantic-level text features for the purpose of click prediction, in particular word embeddings to measure query-ad relevance. In a similar vein of research, Grbovic et al (2015) adopted word embeddings to the task of query rewriting for a better match between queries and keywords that advertisers entered into an auction. Using the embeddings, semantically similar queries are mapped into vectors close in the embedding space, which allows expansion of a query via K-nearest neighbor search.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this session we will focus on semantic matching settings where a supervised signal is available. The signal can be explicit, such as a label for learning task-speci c latent representations [25-27, 36, 47, 48], or relevance labels and, more implicitly, clicks for neural IR methods [15,19,31,41,42]. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%