Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

Sustainability related challenges in mobility planning have been recognised at the international level, and the urgency for change has been widely discussed among scholars. However, there seems to be no general agreement on the best ways to pursue such change. To seek answers to the question of how to pursue change, this study analysed the development of the broad research fields of mobility, urban planning and transitions, and the overlap of these bodies of literature. Both academic and non-academic literatures were covered. By means of a systematic literature review, as well as bibliometric studies, several prominent research themes that address change from planning and transition perspectives were identified. Moreover, these themes describe different viewpoints and challenges in mobility planning. These include planning and policy for sustainable mobility and accessibility, backcasting and scenario planning, indicators in planning, modes of transport, decision-making, studies of global North and global South, as well as overarching themes of equity, equality and justice, roles of institutions, and co-production of knowledge. Strategies for staying up to date with these fields were also identified. In the literature covered, the temporal dimension in mobility planning was described in four different ways, but little was found about how accelerated transitions towards sustainable mobility can be achieved. Further knowledge gaps were identified in relation to behavioural change, policy development, institutionalisation of planning capacity, and social sustainability in mobility planning. This created an outline for possible future studies.

Perspectives on the human dimensions of coral restoration

“…A review was performed using a methodology similar to the systematic quantitative review techniques outlined by Pickering and Bryne (2014) and Pickering et al (2015). This method has been found to be reliable and robust in areas that cross the natural and social sciences (Guitart et al 2012;Steven et al 2011;Turner et al 2018;Nikulina et al 2019). During the first stage all papers were in the search results (n=487).…”

‘Rapid Scenario Planning’ to Support a Regional Sustainability Transformation Vision: A Case Study from Blekinge, Sweden

“…Rather than a prediction, scenarios should allow for a new perspective(s) on a situation, coming to non-conventional conclusions and posing new questions [33]. Often, scenarios are used instead of or alongside visioning statements and support the development of the pathways towards desirable futures [32,[34][35][36]. This workshop utilized an 'explorative' or 'exploratory' scenario approach [4,37].…”

Sustainable Mobility at Thirty

“…The fourth generation of studies applies many of the same methodological approaches as the previous generations. They brought, however, an enormous amount of new theories into the sustainable mobility domain (see [86] for an overview). Within system innovation and transition studies, four theoretical frameworks have achieved quite some prominence [80], these include transition management (e.g., [87]), strategic niche management (e.g., [88]), the multi-level perspective on sociotechnical transitions (e.g., [89]), and technological innovation systems (e.g., [90]).…”