2017
DOI: 10.1080/1369183x.2017.1401511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contested control at the margins of the state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immigrant status precarity thus always includes a high level of 'stateness', in that both access to and restriction of rights are mediated and managed by the state. In recent years, studying this 'management of migration' through policies and practices has become a central focus of the study of migration (Geiger & Pécoud 2012; Eule et al 2018a), with a particular focus on the interlocking and overlapping institutions that together form a 'migration regime' (Sciortino 2004;Eule et al 2018aEule et al , 2018b. From this perspective, migration control is not only executed through individual bodies of the state explicitly formed to do so, but also by other institutions that deal with immigrants and in some way share tasks with 'classic' control agencies.…”
Section: Migration Precarity Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immigrant status precarity thus always includes a high level of 'stateness', in that both access to and restriction of rights are mediated and managed by the state. In recent years, studying this 'management of migration' through policies and practices has become a central focus of the study of migration (Geiger & Pécoud 2012; Eule et al 2018a), with a particular focus on the interlocking and overlapping institutions that together form a 'migration regime' (Sciortino 2004;Eule et al 2018aEule et al , 2018b. From this perspective, migration control is not only executed through individual bodies of the state explicitly formed to do so, but also by other institutions that deal with immigrants and in some way share tasks with 'classic' control agencies.…”
Section: Migration Precarity Advocacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to a large-scale analysis of the effects of visa policy on international migration dynamics, Czaika and de Haas (2014) have pointed to a much-needed consideration of policy implementation, given that migration studies have developed around the question of state capacity to control migration and borders. An expanding strand of research has been focusing on the ways in which migration and border control are put into practice (Dörrembäker & Mastenbroek 2017;Ellerman 2009;Eule et al 2017;Jordan et al 2003). In the case of visa policy, the day-to-day implementation has been analysed both from the point of view of visa applicants (Jileva 2007;Gaibazzi 2014) and state actors (Satzewich 2015;Scheel 2017;Zampagni 2013).…”
Section: A Comparative Implementation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The role that individuals grant to documents and the relevance of 'having the right kind' (or not having any) are both of crucial importance when steering through the migration regime. Indeed, refraining from signing documents, the accumulation of documents to provide evidence or destruction of 'relevant' paperwork (Nakueira, this issue), shows how migrant individuals contest this regime, but also underlines the spaces of highly asym metrical power (Eule et al 2018(Eule et al , 2019.…”
Section: Vtmentioning
confidence: 99%