1983
DOI: 10.1086/261200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure: A Review Article

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If, however, the output was to serve new customers or new customer requirement, a different utility should be set up to eliminate x-inefficiency. This conclusion supports the contention that focusing on scale economies alone can be misleading, because they are hardly a sufficient condition for the existence of natural monopoly (Brock, 1983). One such condition is the existence of sunk costs.…”
Section: Alternative Viewssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…If, however, the output was to serve new customers or new customer requirement, a different utility should be set up to eliminate x-inefficiency. This conclusion supports the contention that focusing on scale economies alone can be misleading, because they are hardly a sufficient condition for the existence of natural monopoly (Brock, 1983). One such condition is the existence of sunk costs.…”
Section: Alternative Viewssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…We might however assume that actual incidents of poaching influence the perception of training firms about the poaching threat. In this context, the market for apprenticeship completers can be regarded as a contestable market (for a survey of the relevant literature, see Brock, 1983). That is, employers can enter this market at no cost, whereas training establishments have incurred sunk costs for their training investment.…”
Section: Implications For the Economics Of Apprentice Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both incumbent firms and potential entrants have access to the same production and investment i e (product innovation) technology: c I = c~ = c 1 and o 2 = o 2 = v s . The second-stage game on prices proceeds as perfect contestability theory (although with positive sunk cost) predicts (Knieps andVogelsang 1982 andBrock 1983 If incumbent firms set prices that earn above-normal profits (P'I >P~), identical potential entrants are then able to enter profitably by offering a slightly lower price such that p~ < p~ < p~, which yields n~ > 0. Bertrand contestability implies that ql = 0 and qf > 0 if the entrant offers a price lower than the incumbent (for equal quality).…”
Section: Two-stage Game With Product Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%