2007
DOI: 10.4304/jnw.2.4.20-27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contention Resolution by Retransmission in Single-hop OPS Metro Networks

Abstract:

We consider a single-hop slotted all-Optical Packet-Switched (OPS) metro network where contention is the major problem. Since contention resolution hardware such as optical buffers and wavelength converters are expensive, we do not use any of these contention resolution hardware inside a core switch. Instead, we consider the retransmission in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the number of retransmissions is not limited in RR, and the multiple retransmissions may lead to a further higher-level (say, TCP layer) retransmission, which may in turn reduce the network throughput, and (2) the Prioritized Retransmission (PR) scheme [9,10,18] in which a few bits, as a priority field, are used to keep the priority of each optical packet. This field is the criterion by which an OPS switch decides to prioritize optical packets in order to find the eligible ones for switching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the number of retransmissions is not limited in RR, and the multiple retransmissions may lead to a further higher-level (say, TCP layer) retransmission, which may in turn reduce the network throughput, and (2) the Prioritized Retransmission (PR) scheme [9,10,18] in which a few bits, as a priority field, are used to keep the priority of each optical packet. This field is the criterion by which an OPS switch decides to prioritize optical packets in order to find the eligible ones for switching.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%