Abstract:A structured trainer's report for use in summative assessment in general practice has been designed, and it is important that the content validity of this report is tested before it is widely adopted. The aim of this paper was to assess the content validity of a proposed report from the perspective of doctors who have recently completed vocational training. A postal questionnaire survey was sent out seeking the views of 220 doctors who had completed vocational training in 1994 as to whether or not the proposed… Show more
“…43 Although the present results suggest what is normally encountered, caution is advised, as the relation between patient mix and competence development is complex 44 and differs between individuals. …”
“…43 Although the present results suggest what is normally encountered, caution is advised, as the relation between patient mix and competence development is complex 44 and differs between individuals. …”
“…We have constructed an OSCE 17 (objective, structured clinical examination) for GPs based on the clinical skills required to commence independent practice 18 (Table 4). Marking schedules for the skills stations were based on some undergraduate stations and some developed for the GMC Professional and Linguistic Assessment Board (PLAB) test, which are set at the standard for a beginning SHO.…”
Section: The Development and Implementation Of The Tests For Gpsmentioning
Objective
This paper describes the development of the tests of competence used as part of the General Medical Council’s assessment of potentially seriously deficient doctors. It is illustrated by reference to tests of knowledge and clinical and practical skills created for general practice.
Subjects and tests
A notional sample of 30 volunteers in ‘good standing’ in the specialty (reference group), 27 practitioners referred to the procedures and four practitioners not referred but who were the focus of concern over their performance. Tests were constructed using available guidelines and a specially convened working group in the specialty.
Methods
Standards were set using Angoff, modified contrasting group and global judgement methods, as appropriate.
Results
Tests performed highly reliably, showed evidence of construct validity, intercorrelated at appropriate levels and, at the standards employed, demonstrated good separation of reference and referred groups. Likelihood ratios for above and below standard performance based on competence were large for each test. Seven of 27 doctors referred were shown not to be deficient in both phases of the performance assessment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.