Content Validity and Preliminary Structural Validity of the Sensory Integration Infant Routines Questionnaire

Lucas, Cátia Couço; Pereira, Ana Paula da Silva; Almeida, Leandro S.; Beaudry‐Bellefeuille, Isabelle

doi:10.1080/19411243.2022.2129901

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Self-report scales have frequently been used to describe different topics in research with a quantitative approach at the interface between Psychology and Education (Boruchovitch et al, 2022;Casanova et al, 2021;Farias et al, 2022;Fleith et al, 2020;Lucas et al, 2022;Marinho-Araujo et al, 2015;Martín-Antón et al, 2023;Santos et al, 2017). In 2018, a self-report scale was proposed, named the Scale of Profile and Practice of School Psychologists (Marinho-Araujo, 2018), with the purpose of investigating school psychologists' profile characteristics and professional competences and practice indicators in Brazilian basic and higher education.…”

Section: Scale Of Profile Indicators Competences and Practices Of The...mentioning

confidence: 99%

School Psychologists Practice and Profile Indicators Scale

Marinho-Araujo,

Almeida,

Lima

et al. 2023

Estud. psicol. (Campinas)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective The purpose of this article is to describe the development process of a research instrument, in the format of a self-report scale, to investigate the school psychologists’ profile, their competencies and professional activities indicators. It is based on the historical-cultural psychology, critical school psychology, and competence approach. Method The method used a review of evidence of theoretical and semantic validity of a scale for profile and competencies contains three guiding lines: (a) instructions and sociodemographic characterization of the participant, (b) profile and competencies of the school psychologist (40 items), and (c) school psychology practices (30 items). Several procedures were carried out for the development and validation of the instrument. The initial version was reviewed by two groups of expert judges, from Brazil and Portugal. The judges’ review led to the removal of some items. The new version was submitted to pilot studies for theoretical and semantic validation. Results As a result of these validations, the most recent version of the scale was obtained for use in Brazil and Portugal. Conclusion It is expected that the instrument will contribute to the theoretical-conceptual and methodological expansion of the psychologist’s profile, affecting how interventions will be carried out in educational and academic spaces from an institutional and collective perspective.

show abstract