1974
DOI: 10.1108/eb050450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content representation in document titles: a case study with prostaglandin literature

Abstract: If you would like to write for this, or any other Emerald publication, then please use our Emerald for Authors service information about how to choose which publication to write for and submission guidelines are available for all. Please visit www.emeraldinsight.com/authors for more information.About Emerald www.emeraldinsight.com AP 1974.26:83-86.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data obtained in the present study run in parallel to those of MILLER [8] who found that title searching could retrieve fom• (i. e. 80 percent) relevant MEDLARS (MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System -a computerized literature search service provided by the National Library of Medicine, Maryland) references for every five (i. e. 100 percent) retrieved by lV1EDLARS index terms searching. The findings reported here also closely approximate those of Ghosh [4] where >prostaglandin-terms( occurred in 84.7 percent ofthe 2,742 titles of prostaglandin literature examined. The 80 percent retrievability of documents using the personalized DSEs and their noneponymic synonyms in the titles further compares favorably to the findings of WINDSOR'S [19] where the >DOPA-words( were found to occur in 71 percent of the titles studied as well as to the implications of SARAOEVIO'S study [15] which meant that with the help of titles alone users would be able to identify about 66-75 percent ofthe relevant documents.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The data obtained in the present study run in parallel to those of MILLER [8] who found that title searching could retrieve fom• (i. e. 80 percent) relevant MEDLARS (MEDical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System -a computerized literature search service provided by the National Library of Medicine, Maryland) references for every five (i. e. 100 percent) retrieved by lV1EDLARS index terms searching. The findings reported here also closely approximate those of Ghosh [4] where >prostaglandin-terms( occurred in 84.7 percent ofthe 2,742 titles of prostaglandin literature examined. The 80 percent retrievability of documents using the personalized DSEs and their noneponymic synonyms in the titles further compares favorably to the findings of WINDSOR'S [19] where the >DOPA-words( were found to occur in 71 percent of the titles studied as well as to the implications of SARAOEVIO'S study [15] which meant that with the help of titles alone users would be able to identify about 66-75 percent ofthe relevant documents.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The lesser-used one, (Montgomery and Swanson 1962;O'Connor 1964;Ghosh 1974), is based on visually examining each title in a specific subject bibliography to see if a certain keyword exists in the title. The other variation of the objective approach, most commonly used, is based on a count of substantive words in the title, and sometimes its total number of words too.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have been published that show a high percentage of relevant papers can be retrieved by use of a key word contained in the title [5,17]. It is a fact that literature about a pharmaceutical product is likely to have the name of that product in the title.…”
Section: Papersmentioning
confidence: 99%