2012
DOI: 10.1159/000345324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content Learning and Identity Construction: A Framework to Strengthen African American Students’ Mathematics and Science Learning in Urban Elementary Schools

Abstract: We present a theoretical framework that views learning as a process involving content learning (CL) and identity construction (IC). We view identities as lenses through which people make sense of, and position themselves, through stories and actions, and as lenses for understanding how they are positioned by others. As people become more (or less) central members of a disciplinary community (e.g., a science or mathematics classroom) and engage (or not) in various cultural practices, changes in identity and kno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
85
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In later publications, many writers defined identity more explicitly, though often authors resisted constraining their definition to narrative and included in it "beliefs," "perceptions of self," "perceptions of mathematics," and "ways of being" (e.g., Bishop 2012). In particular, authors have stressed the importance of performances or enacted identities (Varelas et al 2013). In addition, many authors have refined the concepts related to identity, including "current and designated" identities (Sfard and Prusak 2005), "normative" and "personal" identities (Cobb et al 2009), "leading identities" (Black et al 2009b), and "identifying" as a process of identity construction (Heyd-Metzuyanim and Sfard 2012).…”
Section: Student Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In later publications, many writers defined identity more explicitly, though often authors resisted constraining their definition to narrative and included in it "beliefs," "perceptions of self," "perceptions of mathematics," and "ways of being" (e.g., Bishop 2012). In particular, authors have stressed the importance of performances or enacted identities (Varelas et al 2013). In addition, many authors have refined the concepts related to identity, including "current and designated" identities (Sfard and Prusak 2005), "normative" and "personal" identities (Cobb et al 2009), "leading identities" (Black et al 2009b), and "identifying" as a process of identity construction (Heyd-Metzuyanim and Sfard 2012).…”
Section: Student Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patterns of instruction that "skip" narratives detailing the perspectives, experiences and contributions of subpopulations may result in students learning that such perspectives and contributions are insignificant, anomalies or nonexistent. Considering that sense and meaning-making are both connected to identity development (Nasir, 2011;Varelas, Martin & Kane, 2012), students' interactions with people and curriculum within the classroom are not so much a matter of whether or not they learn, but what they learn about the discipline, themselves and their environment (Nasir & Cook, 2009;Sfard & Prusak, 2005).…”
Section: Learning and Relevance: What Does It All Mean And What Diffementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acquisition of new content knowledge and identity development are separate, but interwoven processes (Varelas, Martin & Kane, 2012). In addition to influencing the likelihood of long term storage of important content, concepts and skills, the extent to which students can identify connections between curriculum and their personal lives, interests and goals can also have implications for both student engagement and their beliefs about what opportunities and future identities are personally and collectively achievable.…”
Section: Learning and Relevance: What Does It All Mean And What Diffementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations