2012
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.662572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content identification of the interdisciplinary assessment of cerebral palsy using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as reference

Abstract: The content of the information involves categories related to the structures and body functions, activities and environmental factors. The information follows a heterogeneous pattern in content and number of categories. The most frequent items can comprise a set of codes for triage of CP. It is necessary to establish an interdisciplinary consensus based on ICF-CY for systematize the information's record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until now, research has been centred on how ICF-CY can be understood, used, and function [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Many studies have applied the functionality of ICF-CY to specific disorders, including cerebral palsy [10], muscular disorders [11,12], spina bifida [13], disability following brain tumours [14], chronic disorders [15], and disability following trauma [16]. Comparison of content with ICF-CY in other various instruments has been performed [17], and validation for core data sets for ICF-CY has begun [18,19] together with studies of ICF-CY functionality and code selection in specific clinical settings [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until now, research has been centred on how ICF-CY can be understood, used, and function [4][5][6][7][8][9]. Many studies have applied the functionality of ICF-CY to specific disorders, including cerebral palsy [10], muscular disorders [11,12], spina bifida [13], disability following brain tumours [14], chronic disorders [15], and disability following trauma [16]. Comparison of content with ICF-CY in other various instruments has been performed [17], and validation for core data sets for ICF-CY has begun [18,19] together with studies of ICF-CY functionality and code selection in specific clinical settings [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Definition of relevance was based on frequency of category use; to our knowledge there are only four experiences of identification of relevant ICF categories in children, with thresholds varying between 30 and 40% (Montirosso et al, 2009a(Montirosso et al, , 2009bAndrade et al, 2012;Leonardi et al, 2012a); therefore, we decided to rely on a conservative 30% selection threshold (for EF, it comprised both facilitators and barriers). The decision to address the presence of problems enabled us to focus on areas requiring intervention, and is consistent with the way in which data are organized in the Dynamic Functional Profile and the Functional Diagnosis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 For other centers, assessment strategies and domains evaluated consistently cover the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health spectrum of body structures and functions, activities and participation, and environmental factors, and these processes are a particular focus for occupational therapists and physical therapists. 14,15 One center developed a ''road-map'' or clinical structure to promote integration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health into practice. Although providers voiced concern regarding the additional workload and organizational requirements of using this framework, with time they no longer felt constrained by this application and indicated that use improved communication between team members and with families 16,17 Formal implementation of this International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-grounded framework is still a ''work in progress,'' although it is acknowledged that use optimizes collaborative goal setting and interdisciplinary communication, and a more global view of the child's rehabilitation needs to promote functioning and health in all relevant environments.…”
Section: International Classification Of Functioning Disability and mentioning
confidence: 99%