Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2020408.2020567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-driven trust propagation framework

Abstract: Existing fact-finding models assume availability of structured data or accurate information extraction. However, as online data gets more unstructured, these assumptions are no longer valid. To overcome this, we propose a novel, content-based, trust propagation framework that relies on signals from the textual content to ascertain veracity of freetext claims and compute trustworthiness of their sources. We incorporate the quality of relevant content into the framework and present an iterative algorithm for pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such an approach has been found to be quite effective for news analysis [23] and sentiment analysis [13,21] tasks. However, sometimes use of negative words like "not" can flip the semantics even though large number of words are shared.…”
Section: Tweet Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such an approach has been found to be quite effective for news analysis [23] and sentiment analysis [13,21] tasks. However, sometimes use of negative words like "not" can flip the semantics even though large number of words are shared.…”
Section: Tweet Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work was followed by some more fact finder algorithms: Sums, Average.Log, Investment, Pooled Investment by Pasternack et al [14]. A large body of work [2,3,8,23,26] has been done further, in this area.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If true, the process diverges into two branches: i) adding the value to the existing group (lines [11][12][13][14] and ii) setting up a new group for the value (lines [15][16][17][18]. In the first case, Algorithm 2 invokes itself, taking the updated solution (with the new value added to the last group) and the updated sublist (with the first value removed) as inputs (line 12).…”
Section: Content-based Groupingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other related approaches include crowdsourcing [9] and web search [2,17]. Crowdsourcing systems assess worker quality in accomplishing their crowdsourcing tasks while web search methods recommend trustworthy source links to answer user's queries.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being able to extract potential facts from text and judge their veracity is not the goal of this work, but has been explored elsewhere (e.g. [20]). …”
Section: Notion Of Medical Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%