Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2002.1038924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-based image retrieval for digital mammography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Muramatsu et al [9] proposed a psychophysical measure based on neural networks for the evaluation of similar images with mammographic masses. For other related previous works, see Tao and Sklansky [10], Ornes et al [11], El-Naqa et al [12], and Nakagawa et al [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Muramatsu et al [9] proposed a psychophysical measure based on neural networks for the evaluation of similar images with mammographic masses. For other related previous works, see Tao and Sklansky [10], Ornes et al [11], El-Naqa et al [12], and Nakagawa et al [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The features extracted from images could be divided into static (snapshot of enhancement at one point in time) and dynamic (time variant) features according to the acquisition protocol at the time of scanning, and into pre-or intratreatment features according to the scanning time point (33). The static features are based on intensity, object morphology, and texture as presented in our previous work on pattern recognition analysis in PET images (15) or our similarity learning in content-based retrieval from mammogram databases (34,35). The dynamic features are extracted from time-varying acquisitions such as dynamic PET, SPECT or MR.…”
Section: Image Features Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This improvement in speed while maintaining effectiveness was also demonstrated in our earlier work by learning the regression of a toy sin c function example from both sequentially and randomly selected data points. 26 All the results above were obtained by assuming that all the feedback samples were selected and used all at once for incremental learning. We also considered an alternative strategy for successive learning as follows.…”
Section: Vb1 Relevance Feedback With Local Perturbationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several studies were performed to develop CBIR systems for mammography. [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] This was initiated by the pioneering work of Swett et al, 23 who developed a computer-based expert system called MAMMO/ICON for automated mammographic image retrieval based on speech recognition technology using findings in the textual report or in the dictation. Mazurowski et al 28 proposed an optimization framework for improving a case-based computer-aided decision ͑CAD͒ system that was developed for the classification of regions of interests ͑ROIs͒ in mammograms.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%