2019 3rd International Conference on Bio-Engineering for Smart Technologies (BioSMART) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/biosmart.2019.8734190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content-based Image Retrieval for Breast Ultrasound Images using Convolutional Autoencoders: A Feasibility Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features bring benefits to CBHIR, such as ignoring the noise in WSIs that might be noticeable due to the scanners. Also, they can reduce the demand for annotated images for training an FE, which is expensive and time-consuming [40,41].…”
Section: Feature Extractormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These features bring benefits to CBHIR, such as ignoring the noise in WSIs that might be noticeable due to the scanners. Also, they can reduce the demand for annotated images for training an FE, which is expensive and time-consuming [40,41].…”
Section: Feature Extractormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, at this stage, the welltrained CAE extracts the features of the images of the validation and training sets. These feature vectors are subsequently indexed and saved as the features of the database for the searching process [41].…”
Section: Searchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar procedure based on measuring the similarity of the latent features from different input data has been applied on different state-of-the-art techniques, such as contrastive learning [77][78][79] or content-based image retrieval (CBIR) [80][81][82]. In contrastive learning tasks, an encoder network followed by a projection head is trained to differentiate between positive and negative samples, being positive samples the augmented version of a query (or samples with the same label in the case of supervised contrastive [77]), and negative samples the entire remainder of the batch.…”
Section: Static Prototypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this point, several contributions are proposed in a novel framework for glaucoma grading. The method based on static prototypes was conducted for the first time by inferring the weights (φ → Θ) of class-based prediction networks, instead of auto-encoders, as in the case of CBIR-based studies [80][81][82], or architectures intended to discern between positive and negative classes, as in the contrastive learning works [77][78][79]. Notwithstanding, the main novelties related to the prototypical environment were introduced in the dynamic approximation.…”
Section: About the Ablation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several US denoising techniques based on deep learning have been widely used, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) [11,12,13,14], Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) [15,16,17], and Autoencoders (AEs) [18,19], which can recover the original dataset and make it noisefree with better robustness and precision [20]. Deep learning methods have obtained better results in medical imaging in comparison with previous methods such as Wavelet, Wiener, Gaussian [21], Multi-Layer perceptron [22], Dictionary Learning [23], Least Square, Bilateral Filter, Non-Local Mean [24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%