2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1499-4046(06)60097-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Content Analysis: Review of Methods and Their Applications in Nutrition Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
773
0
19

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,129 publications
(792 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
773
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the different categories, going back and forth between the data and the critical common-sense interpretation to allow new insights to emerge (Kondracki, Wellman, & Amundson, 2002). This is a suggested approach when existing research literature on a phenomenon is limited (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the different categories, going back and forth between the data and the critical common-sense interpretation to allow new insights to emerge (Kondracki, Wellman, & Amundson, 2002). This is a suggested approach when existing research literature on a phenomenon is limited (Hsieh & Shannon, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accordingly, we have data that cover two layers of knowledge about youth events as a novel research field. Further, an examination through content analysis was deemed preferable, as content analysis is a process for systematically analysing all types of messages, and a technique which lies at the crossroads of qualitative and quantitative method (Kondracki, Wellman, & Amundson, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central to this method is a systematic classification process of text data into fewer content-related themes that share the same meaning (Cavanagh, 1997;Downe-Wamboldt, 1992). Themes were inductively developed rather than being superimposed upon the data (Kondracki, Wellman, & Damundson, 2002). Content analysis is appropriate for studying phenomena about which little is known (Waltz, Strickland, & Lenz, 2005).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%