2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary vertical crustal deformation in Cascadia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the corrected errors in the South Beach and Astoria tidal records, the exclusion of the biased 1941 leveling data, and the correction of the 1988 leveling error between Charleston and South Beach all make the tidal and leveling data sets more consistent with one another. As a result of the greater rate of sea level rise and corrected South Beach tidal record, we infer that no portion of the Oregon Coast Range is currently undergoing regional‐scale subsidence, as suggested previously [ Mitchell et al , 1994; Verdonck , 2006]. This is more consistent with models of subduction zone locking constrained with horizontal GPS velocities, which predict positive uplift rates well into the Coast Range, and even the Willamette Valley (Figure 1) [ Wang et al , 2003; McCaffrey et al , 2007].…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Of Vertical Velocitysupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, the corrected errors in the South Beach and Astoria tidal records, the exclusion of the biased 1941 leveling data, and the correction of the 1988 leveling error between Charleston and South Beach all make the tidal and leveling data sets more consistent with one another. As a result of the greater rate of sea level rise and corrected South Beach tidal record, we infer that no portion of the Oregon Coast Range is currently undergoing regional‐scale subsidence, as suggested previously [ Mitchell et al , 1994; Verdonck , 2006]. This is more consistent with models of subduction zone locking constrained with horizontal GPS velocities, which predict positive uplift rates well into the Coast Range, and even the Willamette Valley (Figure 1) [ Wang et al , 2003; McCaffrey et al , 2007].…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Of Vertical Velocitysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…South from the central Oregon minimum, mean subsidence estimates increase to greater values in the vicinity of Coos Bay (Charleston) and Cape Blanco [ Leonard et al , 2004]. The low, but positive interseismic uplift rates we observe along the central Oregon coast resolve the mismatch between previous estimates of interseismic subsidence and paleoseismic signs of coseismic subsidence in this area [ Mitchell et al , 1994; Verdonck , 2006].…”
Section: Cascadia Subduction Zone Lockingmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…7). This agrees well with the results of Verdonck (2006), who computed an estimated rate of land movement of 4.0 ± 0.1 mm yr −1 . In his estimate, he subtracts a mean eustatic sea level rise 2.0 mm yr −1 from the trend calculated from the tide gauge data (−2.0 mm yr −1 ).…”
Section: Plate Tectonics: Neah Bay (Neah) Canadasupporting
confidence: 92%
“…6). This is in accordance with the results obtained by Verdonck (Verdonck, 2006), who arrives at a 4.0 ± 0.1 mm/yr trend through the analysis of 220 tide gauge data. Sea level from altimetry yields a trend of standard deviation of solution residuals weighted average is shown in Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 93%
“…Historical records in eastern Puget Sound show more variability. Using almost 100 years of tide gauge records, Holdahl et al (1989) interpreted 1-2-mm submergence a year near Gorst, yet Verdonck (2006) found no evidence for submergence also using tide gauges. Compiling a variety of geologic records, Shipman (1989) predicted submersion of 1 mm=yr in the area around Gorst.…”
Section: Puget Lowland Quaternary Historymentioning
confidence: 99%