2021
DOI: 10.3390/heritage4030098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Sound Practices: Church Bells and Bell Ringing in New South Wales, Australia

Abstract: As a social species, humans have developed soundscapes that surround, and to some extent circumscribe, their daily existence. The concept of aural heritage, its conceptualization and its management represent a rapidly expanding area of research, covering aspects of both natural and human heritage. However, there have been no contemporary regional or supra-regional studies that examine the nature of sound making in Christian religious settings, nor the extent to which it is still used. This paper presents the r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2018–2019, the authors undertook a study examining church bell ringing in the state of New South Wales, Australia, with research questions investigating the extent of church bell ringing still practiced, what factors may determine this differentiation, and what values and significances were attributed to the bell ringing sounds by the practitioners themselves. While the full data is reported elsewhere ( Parker and Spennemann, 2020b ; Parker and Spennemann, 2021 ), we found that a high proportion of Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox churches retained bells on church premises, especially in churches of a historic period. For these churches that had bells, a large proportion of these denominations actually rang them, and there was subsequently a high level of perceived value placed on bell ringing, especially because it was considered a form of heritage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…In 2018–2019, the authors undertook a study examining church bell ringing in the state of New South Wales, Australia, with research questions investigating the extent of church bell ringing still practiced, what factors may determine this differentiation, and what values and significances were attributed to the bell ringing sounds by the practitioners themselves. While the full data is reported elsewhere ( Parker and Spennemann, 2020b ; Parker and Spennemann, 2021 ), we found that a high proportion of Anglican, Roman Catholic, and Orthodox churches retained bells on church premises, especially in churches of a historic period. For these churches that had bells, a large proportion of these denominations actually rang them, and there was subsequently a high level of perceived value placed on bell ringing, especially because it was considered a form of heritage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…The view of individuals can be quite opinionated and often with disparate attitudes on the action of bell ringing, and significantly, bell ringing practice can alter with the installation of a new priest [24]. A survey of bell ringing practices in New South Wales found that, overall, Anglican, Uniting, and Presbyterian clergy tend to attribute a lower significance to bell ringing than wardens, the church council, or the congregation [21]. Only among Roman Catholic clergy does bell ringing hold a considerable level of significance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the effective power over soundscapes generated by the church bells rests with the individual clergy at the local level has serious implications well beyond the individual congregation. Without doubt, the ringing of church bells contributes to the soundscape of a community and thus should be regarded as part of a community's cultural heritage [19,21]. Unlike with other cultural heritage assets, where there is a formal multi-layered process to assess the adverse impact of any proposed activity (see Figure 1), it is the power of a single clergy, who are untrained in issues of heritage management, that can make these decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations