New Urban Geographies of the Creative and Knowledge Economies 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9781351121835-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Production, Innovative Workplaces, and Urban Space: Projects and Policies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some authors mobilize the framework of commons-based peer production and open innovation to look at the experience of the first Makerspaces (Arvidsson et al 2015;Smith et al 2013), eventually stressing their role to act as alternatives to the capitalist economy (Chiappini & Törnberg 2018). Others emphasize the capacity of these spaces to create new urban and regional entrepreneurial ecosystems (Doussard et al 2017;Fiorentino 2018) and to contribute to the rise of new urban economies in the era of digital capitalism (Armondi & Di Vita 2017). These double, contradictory frameworks resonate with the apparent paradox that characterizes the so-called sharing economy, defined either as an alternative to capitalism or as part of a digitalized form of it .…”
Section: Collaborative Production In the Digital Age: The Rise Of Mak...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some authors mobilize the framework of commons-based peer production and open innovation to look at the experience of the first Makerspaces (Arvidsson et al 2015;Smith et al 2013), eventually stressing their role to act as alternatives to the capitalist economy (Chiappini & Törnberg 2018). Others emphasize the capacity of these spaces to create new urban and regional entrepreneurial ecosystems (Doussard et al 2017;Fiorentino 2018) and to contribute to the rise of new urban economies in the era of digital capitalism (Armondi & Di Vita 2017). These double, contradictory frameworks resonate with the apparent paradox that characterizes the so-called sharing economy, defined either as an alternative to capitalism or as part of a digitalized form of it .…”
Section: Collaborative Production In the Digital Age: The Rise Of Mak...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, scholars in both economic geography and urban studies have recently drawn attention to the spatial dimension of the phenomenon, claiming that the rise of Makers represents an innovation in the production system that entails important socio-spatial transformations too. However, these works generally assume that the most relevant spatial dimension of the phenomenon is constituted by the city, considering Makers as part of a univocal shift in contemporary urban economies in the era of digital capitalism (Armondi & Bruzzese 2017;Armondi & Di Vita 2017;Capdevila 2018). In so doing, they also take for granted the relevance of the phenomenon in terms of its capacity to constitute a shift in contemporary urban economies, usually drawing on a mainstream discourse that portrays Makers as examples of democratization of production and a new way of organizing the innovation process (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors mobilize the framework of commons-based peer production and open innovation to look at the experience of the first Makerspaces (Arvidsson et al 2015;Smith et al 2013), eventually stressing their role to act as alternatives to the capitalist economy (Chiappini & Törnberg 2018). Others emphasize the capacity of these spaces to create new urban and regional entrepreneurial ecosystems (Doussard et al 2017;Fiorentino 2018) and to contribute to the rise of new urban economies in the era of digital capitalism (Armondi & Di Vita 2017). These double, contradictory frameworks resonate with the apparent paradox that characterizes the so-called sharing economy, defined either as an alternative to capitalism or as part of a digitalized form of it (Richardson 2015).…”
Section: Collaborative Production In the Digital Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, scholars in both economic geography and urban studies have recently drawn attention to the spatial dimension of the phenomenon, claiming that the rise of Makers represents an innovation in the production system that entails important socio-spatial transformations too. However, these works generally assume that the most relevant spatial dimension of the phenomenon is constituted by the city, considering Makers as part of a univocal shift in contemporary urban economies in the era of digital capitalism (Armondi & Bruzzese 2017;Armondi & Di Vita 2017;Capdevila 2018). In so doing, they also take for granted the relevance of the phenomenon in terms of its capacity to constitute a shift in contemporary urban economies, usually drawing on a mainstream discourse that portrays Makers as examples of democratization of production and a new way of organizing the innovation process (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%