2007
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.106.618587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Pacemaker and Defibrillator Device Therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 142 publications
(139 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 In addition, clinicians caring for heart failure patients may be reluctant to screen for low ejection fraction and/or to refer otherwise appropriate patients for ICD/CRT-D implantation because of concerns about the potential for adverse clinical consequences from ICDs. 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 In addition, clinicians caring for heart failure patients may be reluctant to screen for low ejection fraction and/or to refer otherwise appropriate patients for ICD/CRT-D implantation because of concerns about the potential for adverse clinical consequences from ICDs. 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such devices can be classified into two types: those that exist for long periods of time, typically designed to be permanent; and those that disappear, or resorb, in the body after they provide some useful function. The former includes both simple, passive devices such as artificial joints and pins,1 as well as sophisticated electronic components such as deep brain electrical stimulators,2 cardiac pacemakers3 and programmable drug delivery systems 4. The latter, by contrast, is currently available only in the form of passive elements such as resorbable sutures5, 6 or matrices for drug release,7, 8 degradable intravascular stents9, 10 and resorbable plate‐screw systems 11.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%