Contemporary Issues in Group Learning in Undergraduate Science Classrooms: A Perspective from Student Engagement

Abstract

As the use of collaborative-learning methods such as group work in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics classes has grown, so has the research into factors impacting effectiveness, the kinds of learning engendered, and demographic differences in student response. Generalizing across the range of this research is complicated by the diversity of group-learning approaches used. In this overview, I discuss theories of how group-work formats support or hinder learning based on the ICAP (interactive, constructive, active, passive) framework of student engagement. I then use this model to analyze current issues in group learning, such as the nature of student discourse during group work, the role of group learning in making our classrooms inclusive, and how classroom spaces factor into group learning. I identify key gaps for further research and propose implications from this research for teaching practice. This analysis helps identify essential, effective, and efficient features of group learning, thus providing faculty with constructive guidelines to support their work and affirm their efforts.

Exploring the educational needs of nurses on children’s pain management: A descriptive qualitative study

“…In general, a face‐to‐face interactive educational session with a group were most often identified as preferable. As pointed out by earlier studies (Graham, ; Hodges, ), the perceived benefits of a face‐face interactive educational session with a group are the ability to group‐think, share ideas, and learn from other members while receiving prompt feedback. This approach also supports the main purpose of continual professional development, which is to update nurses’ knowledge and skills for enhanced and improved patient care (Filipe, Silva, Stulting, & Golnik, ).…”

Factors Influencing Quality of Team Discussion: Discourse Analysis in an Undergraduate Team-Based Learning Biology Course

“…Instructors often struggle with the question of whether student learning is best promoted by using permanent teams or by re-forming teams periodically. Although evidence is scant on this issue (Hodges, 2018), it is possible that the more time students spend together, the more they are able to, or practice, decentering behaviors, in which they take on the perspective of another individual or context besides their own (Moon et al, 2017). In addition, a study in a peer instruction classroom found that students became more expert-like in their thinking if groups were permanent (Zhang et al, 2017).…”

Exploring Artifact-Generated Learning with Digital Technologies: Advancing Active Learning with Co-design in Higher Education Across Disciplines

“…All groups, especially Group 4, had difficulties with time management which is not surprising because time issues are a reported problem in courses (Hodges 2018). To address this issue in advance the course had five milestones for the groups to deliver first results.…”