2014
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-444-53776-8.00003-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Experimental Aesthetics: Procedures and Findings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Much more often, eye movements are analyzed from the first second after onset of the exposure time of the single painting (e.g., Kapoula et al, 2008 ), the first five (e.g., Vogt and Magnussen, 2007 ), or first 10 s (e.g., Pihko et al, 2011 ). This idea is based on the concept of the two phases of an aesthetic experience with paintings, according to which, during the first few seconds of viewing the painting, its aesthetic value is determined, and then the viewing time is devoted to more detailed exploration (Locher et al, 2007 ; Locher, 2014a ). Simultaneous exposure of two or more paintings causes that the number of fixations of eyes on paintings being compared do not necessarily evenly distribute on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much more often, eye movements are analyzed from the first second after onset of the exposure time of the single painting (e.g., Kapoula et al, 2008 ), the first five (e.g., Vogt and Magnussen, 2007 ), or first 10 s (e.g., Pihko et al, 2011 ). This idea is based on the concept of the two phases of an aesthetic experience with paintings, according to which, during the first few seconds of viewing the painting, its aesthetic value is determined, and then the viewing time is devoted to more detailed exploration (Locher et al, 2007 ; Locher, 2014a ). Simultaneous exposure of two or more paintings causes that the number of fixations of eyes on paintings being compared do not necessarily evenly distribute on them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullot y Reber, 2013; Jacobsen, 2006;Leder et al, 2004;Locher, 2006Locher, , 2011Locher, , 2014Silva, 2009, 2012): a) Proveer a los participantes información sobre el estilo de pintores abstractos, incrementa los valores de preferencia en los sujetos. Sin embargo, este incremento en las preferencias no se observa en participantes con un alto nivel de experiencia artística (Belke et al, 2006) b) Existe una correlación positiva entre cómo se evalúa una pintura ("goodness") y la facilidad con la que el observador puede inferir la intención del autor al realizar esa pintura.…”
Section: Vartanian Y Goel 2004)unclassified
“…Eye tracking technique has an important potential for revealing the perceptual and cognitive processes underlying the aesthetic evaluation of the artworks. It is used for empirical examination of art processes by many researchers (Borji and Itti, 2014;Einhäuser, Spain, & Perona, 2018;Francuz, Zaniewski, Augustynowicz, Kopiś & Jankowski, 2018;Kesner et al, 2018;Locher, 2014;Locher, Gray and Nodine, 1996;Locher, Krupinski and Schaefer, 2015;Nodine, Mello-Thoms, Krupinsky, Locher, 2008). For example, the reactions of the pupils were examined when they encounter an aesthetic image (Johnson, Muday, & Schirillo, 2010;Kuchinke, Trapp, Jacobs, & Leder, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%