2019
DOI: 10.1177/0309816819852752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary employer victimisation of lay union representatives in Britain: Issues, dynamics and extent

Abstract: This article examines the extent, nature and dynamics of employer victimisation of lay union representatives in Britain between 1998 and 2018, finding that the extent of victimisation is greater than would have been thought. This puts it on a par with the grievous phenomenon of blacklisting.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, hostile employer behaviour often coerces workers into refraining from exercising any preference they have for joining and supporting a union (for a summary of the situations in Australia, Britain and the US, see Gall and Dundon, 2013). Employer behaviour may range from unfair labour practices, such as threatened and actual dismissals, to social ostracism for spurning management's unitarist workplace culture (see, for example, Gall, 2004Gall, , 2010Gall, , 2021Logan, 2006Logan, , 2013Moody, 2013). Third, such union recognition procedures are often predicated upon what has been referred to as a 'tyranny of majoritarianism', whereby collective labour rights are denied until more than 50% of a given bargaining unit expresses support, typically via a vote.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, hostile employer behaviour often coerces workers into refraining from exercising any preference they have for joining and supporting a union (for a summary of the situations in Australia, Britain and the US, see Gall and Dundon, 2013). Employer behaviour may range from unfair labour practices, such as threatened and actual dismissals, to social ostracism for spurning management's unitarist workplace culture (see, for example, Gall, 2004Gall, , 2010Gall, , 2021Logan, 2006Logan, , 2013Moody, 2013). Third, such union recognition procedures are often predicated upon what has been referred to as a 'tyranny of majoritarianism', whereby collective labour rights are denied until more than 50% of a given bargaining unit expresses support, typically via a vote.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indirect costs are those that relate to second-order consequences that arise from a switch, particularly management retribution for having joined the union. Discriminatory treatment, harassment, and even dismissal of union members can generate indirect costs that dwarf any benefits of membership (Gall, 2021; Godard, 2003), spurring workers to stay with the non-union default.…”
Section: Default Influencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings point to the long‐term influence of place in explaining dynamics of political economy. Gall emphasized that the early twenty‐first century has been accompanied by the significant deployment of anti‐trade union tactics by the employer. In an article for Capital & Class , he details employers’ victimization of union activists through suspensions and sackings between 1998 and 2018, finding that both were used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%