2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2008.09.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary crustal extension in the Umbria–Marche Apennines from regional CGPS networks and comparison between geodetic and seismic deformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
50
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
7
50
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The three main events show normal focal mechanisms striking NNW-SSE, in agreement with the extensional tectonic regime of the central Apennines (D'Agostino et al, 2009). The hypocenter has been located at 13.238°E, 42.704°N, at a depth of 8.0 km (http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/event/7073641); it is the first shock of a seismic sequence characterized by three damaging earthquakes occurred in central Italy between August and October.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The three main events show normal focal mechanisms striking NNW-SSE, in agreement with the extensional tectonic regime of the central Apennines (D'Agostino et al, 2009). The hypocenter has been located at 13.238°E, 42.704°N, at a depth of 8.0 km (http://cnt.rm.ingv.it/event/7073641); it is the first shock of a seismic sequence characterized by three damaging earthquakes occurred in central Italy between August and October.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This subjective element was emphasized by Caporali et al [2003]. D'Agostino et al [2009] showed that different assumptions for the seismic depth and/or the tension factor used in the spline interpolation of the velocities (the tension factor plays a role similar to that of our scaling distance d 0 in the collocation algorithm) could lead to contradictory results for the energy balance of a seismic province. Our approach defines the seismic volume as an integral across the magnitude spectrum and recognizes that each magnitude involves a different deforming volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“… Slejko et al [2010] obtained 30 year earthquake probabilities by combining geodetic data with the seismogenic areas of known depth, strike, dip, rake, geologic slip rate and expected maximum magnitude derived from the Database of Italian Seismogenic Sources (DISS) [ Basili et al , 2008]. D'Agostino et al [2009] concentrated on a dense GPS network in the extensional and seismically active area in central Italy and concluded that there is a deficit in seismic activity relative to the geodetically measured deformation rate.…”
Section: Geodesy and Seismic Hazard In Italymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chiaraluce et al (2007) interpreted these features as the presence within the fault system of fault zones possessing different rheology and/or frictional properties. It is also worth noting that the microseismicity nucleating on the ATF is not able to explain the amount of deformation associated with the short-and long-term slip rate inferred by geological (Collettini and Holdsworth, 2004) and geodetic studies and data (D'Agostino et al, 2009). These observations together with the lack of large-magnitude (M>7) historical earthquakes that ruptured the whole ATF in the past 1000 years (Rovida et al, 2011;Chiaraluce et al, 2014) suggest the occurrence of aseismic deformation or creeping as proposed by Hreinsdottir and Bennett (2009) by interpreting regional GPS data.…”
Section: The Alto Tiberina Fault Systemmentioning
confidence: 97%