2012
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporary Anthropologies of Indigenous Australia

Abstract: This review covers sociocultural ethnographies of indigenous Australia from the 1970s to the present. It explores three trends: ethnographic reckonings with indigenous encapsulation within a liberal-settler state; the influence of international theoretical emphases; and movements toward an anthropology of the otherwise. The advent of land repossession, and the ethnographic and employment opportunities this created, indelibly shaped the discipline. With their immersion in land rights and native title, anthropol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(42 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The growing number of relationships between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people and of anthropological characterisations of Aboriginal people as ‘intercultural’ may falsely suggest seamless integrations of non‐Aboriginal people into Aboriginal social schema. There are few who have undertaken fieldwork which pays attention to the experiences of non‐Aboriginal people who are co‐resident with Aborigines (Cowlishaw : 11; Lea : 188). On Mornington Island it may be the case that as McKnight (: 142) observed: ‘Aboriginal women often took the leading role in establishing a relationship with a European Australian’, and as he put it, ‘that they did so (and do so) for a variety of complex economic and social reasons’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The growing number of relationships between Aboriginal and non‐Aboriginal people and of anthropological characterisations of Aboriginal people as ‘intercultural’ may falsely suggest seamless integrations of non‐Aboriginal people into Aboriginal social schema. There are few who have undertaken fieldwork which pays attention to the experiences of non‐Aboriginal people who are co‐resident with Aborigines (Cowlishaw : 11; Lea : 188). On Mornington Island it may be the case that as McKnight (: 142) observed: ‘Aboriginal women often took the leading role in establishing a relationship with a European Australian’, and as he put it, ‘that they did so (and do so) for a variety of complex economic and social reasons’.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in Australia, where bureaucratized apperception of Indigenous possibility reigns even within anthropological circles (Lea ), there is an ongoing demand that Aboriginal people adhere to reifications of their traditions. In terms of content, Indigenous sufferers must be obligated by their responsibilities to country, and be thwarted by an uncaring State, in particularly recognizable ways.…”
Section: Talking To Viewers Talking To Karrabing: Lessons In Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Merlan seems compelled to distance herself from its increasingly routine use to describe shared spaces, suggesting instead that she was oriented originally to modes of action and processes and focused upon the inter , seeing subjectivity ‘as always fundamentally under construction, and always fundamentally relational’ (2005: 169; 2013). Tess Lea (: 191) has pointed to important limitations of this term's usage, highlighting that ‘only one side of the colonial relation is intercultural,’ as attention is typically directed towards Aboriginal people's imbrication with settler society, and not the reverse. Lea's criticism directs us to emphasise two principles for future research.…”
Section: Alliances or Entanglements?mentioning
confidence: 99%