Contemporaneous peer effects, career age and the industry involvement of academics in biotechnology

Abstract

This study explores the role of contemporaneous peer effects in driving an academic's involvement with industry. Specifically, we examine the influence of workplace peers and personal collaborators and how these effects are moderated by the career age of the scientist. Moreover, we look at situations in which both types of social influence are incongruent and the academic is faced with "dissonance".Based on survey data of 355 German academics in the field of biotechnology and publication data from the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), we find that the scientist's involvement with industry increases with the orientation of the scientist's department towards industry ("localized peer effect"). This effect turns out to be moderated by the scientist's age, such that the localized peer effect decreases with age and finally turns negative for very senior scientists. Moreover, we find that a scientist's involvement increases with the industry orientation of the scientist's co-authors ("personal peer effect"), irrespective of the scientist's age. In case both types of social influence are incongruent, younger scientists will revert to localized norms while more experienced scientists will orient themselves more towards their personal collaborators.

How does working on university–industry collaborative projects affect science and engineering doctorates’ careers? Evidence from a UK research-based university

“…Non-response bias is assessed and no significant bias is found. 6 After missing data are excluded, 101 valid responses are used for factor analysis and 92 valid responses are used for the rest of the analysis.…”

In Good Company: The Influence of Peers on Industry Engagement by Academic Scientists

“…While one may suspect that similar considerations may hold for greater participation in the traditional missions of the university sector, very few studies have addressed this question. Louis et al (1989) found that local norms were more powerful predictors of various types of engagement than individual characteristics and Aschhoff and Grimpe (2014), using publications data, show that the publishing behaviours of both departmental colleagues and academic co-authors' shape researchers' academic engagement with industry, with this effect being more pronounced in the earlier stages of their academic careers.…”

How do Scientists Contribute to the Performance of Innovative Start‐ups? An Imprinting Perspective on Open Innovation

“…The careers (Aschhoff and Grimpe, 2014;Bercovitz and Feldman, 2008) and entrepreneurship literatures (Colombo and Piva, 2012;Jain et al, 2009) have highlighted the distinctiveness of the scientist career imprint. Scientists are defined as individuals involved in research and scientific work in academia and other research institutions, such as independent and non-profit research institutions and governmental research organizations (Stephan, 2014).…”