2019
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzz118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contemporaneous patient and health professional views of patient-centred care: a systematic review

Abstract: Objective To understand the domains of agreement and disagreement, related to person-centred care, between the patient and healthcare professional during a shared episode of care. Design A systematic review following the PRISMA protocol searched PubMed (Medline), CINAHL, PsychInfo and Scopus using keywords for health professionals, patients and patient-centred care. A descriptive-interpretive method was used to identify domai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 11 PCC and 9 obstetrical care reviews were included. 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 These were from the United States of America ( n = 4), United Kingdom ( n = 3) and Australia, ( n = 2), and one each from Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland, Belgium, German, Tanzania, India, Europe, Iran and South Africa. Studies were published from 2012 to 2021. Review types included concept analysis ( n = 7), systematic review ( n = 9), scoping review ( n = 3), narrative review ( n = 1) and qualitative evidence synthesis (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 11 PCC and 9 obstetrical care reviews were included. 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 These were from the United States of America ( n = 4), United Kingdom ( n = 3) and Australia, ( n = 2), and one each from Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland, Belgium, German, Tanzania, India, Europe, Iran and South Africa. Studies were published from 2012 to 2021. Review types included concept analysis ( n = 7), systematic review ( n = 9), scoping review ( n = 3), narrative review ( n = 1) and qualitative evidence synthesis (n = 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 11 PCC and 9 obstetrical care reviews were included. [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] These were from the United States of America (n = 4), United Kingdom (n = 3) and Australia, (n = 2), and one each from Canada, Denmark, Sweden, Ireland, Belgium, German, Tanzania, India, Europe, Iran and South Africa. Studies were published from 2012 to 2021.…”
Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partners can provide important additional information on survivors' needs and wishes as they are often the most important part of survivors' social network and one of their main sources of information, advice and support ( 22 24 ). Also, involving survivors' supportive others, are cornerstones of optimal patient-centered care which has become the gold standard of care delivery ( 25 , 26 ). However, only few studies include data provided by partners, and to our knowledge, none has focused specifically on the long-term needs and wishes of alloHSCT-survivors and also included their partners' views in relationship to survivors' needs and care using a qualitative approach ( 27 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People's perception of patient-centered care is associated with the need for the work in teams of healthcare professionals, for respectful and compassionate care, and for patient-involvement, engagement empowerment (Gogovor et al. , 2019; Jaensch et al. , 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%