Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination-pipetting: relative efficiency of filter tips compared to Microman® positive displacement pipette

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total mass of the simulated carryover contamination for each reaction was approximately equivalent to a 0.124 μm-diameter aerosol droplet, which cannot be efficiently blocked by either high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters48 in the biosafety cabinets or fibrous pipette tip filters49. The detection limits of the rRT-LAMP reactions with and without UDG treatment before amplification were compared to confirm whether the studied UDG-rRT-LAMP assay can eliminate false positives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total mass of the simulated carryover contamination for each reaction was approximately equivalent to a 0.124 μm-diameter aerosol droplet, which cannot be efficiently blocked by either high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters48 in the biosafety cabinets or fibrous pipette tip filters49. The detection limits of the rRT-LAMP reactions with and without UDG treatment before amplification were compared to confirm whether the studied UDG-rRT-LAMP assay can eliminate false positives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the ability of the developed UDG-rRT-LAMP method to reduce false-positive results due to carryover contaminants in detecting TMUV, we conducted both rRT-LAMP and UDG-rRT-LAMP reactions by adding 2 μL of diluted viral RNA templates (0.5 × 10 −1 − 0.5 × 10 4 copies/μL) and 2 μL of simulated carryover contamination of 0.5 × 10 −18 g/μL in the same reaction tube. The total mass of the simulated carryover contamination for each reaction was approximately equivalent to a 0.124 μm-diameter aerosol droplet, which cannot be efficiently blocked by either high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters 48 in the biosafety cabinets or fibrous pipette tip filters 49 . The detection limits of the rRT-LAMP reactions with and without UDG treatment before amplification were compared to confirm whether the studied UDG-rRT-LAMP assay can eliminate false positives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, improper handling during the DNA extraction or the DNA dispersal to PCR plates can occur ( Ballenghien et al, 2017 ). Thus, DNA from actual samples may be aerosolized ( Le Rouzic, 2006 ) and cross-contaminate adjacent wells, including low-biomass control blanks. For the CoDL dataset, testing for aerosolization in control samples is difficult, as most studies did not include controls for sequencing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total mass of simulated carryover contaminants (1 × 10 -18 g) for each reaction is approximately equivalent to a 0.2-μm-diameter aerosol droplet. In the clinical and basic laboratories, the aerosol droplet could not be completely eliminated by either high efficiency particulate air filters or fibrous pipette tip filters in the biosafety cabinets ( Le Rouzic, 2006 ; Barhate and Ramakrishna, 2007 ; Wang et al, 2017a ). The LoD of m-MCDA assay with AUDG and without AUDG digestion before amplification was compared to validate whether the AUDG enzyme has the ability to remove false-positive results in the m-MCDA methods.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%