1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1116(09)70113-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination offish with 137Cs in Kiev reservoir and old river bed of Pripyat near Chernobyl

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Contrary to observations for radiocaesium (Hadderingh et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2002), there was no evidence of a clear ''size effect'' of increasing 90 Sr activity concentration with increasing fish weight. None of the relationships observed in Fig.…”
Section: ''Size Effect'' On 90 Sr Accumulation By Fishcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…3). Contrary to observations for radiocaesium (Hadderingh et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2002), there was no evidence of a clear ''size effect'' of increasing 90 Sr activity concentration with increasing fish weight. None of the relationships observed in Fig.…”
Section: ''Size Effect'' On 90 Sr Accumulation By Fishcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The ''size effect,'' whereby larger (in terms of weight) fish have higher activity concentrations of radiocaesium, has been documented in both river and lake fish populations (Elliott et al, 1992;Hadderingh et al, 1997). This has been ascribed to differences in feeding habits, metabolism, excretion and the nonequilibrium in the fish-water system (Elliott et al, 1992;Ugedal et al, 1995;Hadderingh et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been ascribed to differences in feeding habits, metabolism, excretion and the nonequilibrium in the fish-water system (Elliott et al, 1992;Ugedal et al, 1995;Hadderingh et al, 1997;Smith et al, 2005). In Øvre Heimdalsvatn, there are some differences in feeding habits, habitat and growth rates between trout of different sizes ) that could explain the size effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the long term, activity concentrations in predatory fish were significantly higher than non predatory fish and large fish tended to have higher activity concentrations than small. The increase in activity concentration in large fish is termed the "size effect" (Elliot et al 1992;Hadderingh et al 1997) and is due to metabolic and dietary differences. In addition, older, larger fish were exposed to higher levels of 137 Cs in the water than younger, smaller fish.…”
Section: Fig 255 Averaged 137mentioning
confidence: 99%