2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.05.148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination of rotary instruments re-used in a hospital-based oral and maxillofacial surgery clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study reported by Hogg & Morrison (2005) showed a high level of bacterial contamination of bone burs in spite of previous cleaning and gas sterilization. They reported that the cleaning and sterilization procedures used in dental practices were not sufficient to eliminate contamination and that it was better to classify some of the instruments as single‐use devices, even though financial considerations may inhibit the general acceptance of this practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study reported by Hogg & Morrison (2005) showed a high level of bacterial contamination of bone burs in spite of previous cleaning and gas sterilization. They reported that the cleaning and sterilization procedures used in dental practices were not sufficient to eliminate contamination and that it was better to classify some of the instruments as single‐use devices, even though financial considerations may inhibit the general acceptance of this practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the incidence of patient-to-patient cross infection has not been investigated after the use of reusable RSB forceps, there is evidence to support the potential for such infection from surgical instruments in general [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major and unavoidable medical drawback of drills, burs and slow-oscillating saws is the enormous procedural bone loss due to the minimum necessary diameter of the instrument of at least 1,5 -2 mm and the imprecision of the cut due to the high torque-moment, which has to be tamed by the hand of the surgeon as the author´s demonstration in vivo shows (Figure 1). Additional, there is a high risk of soft tissue injury to important anatomical structures such as the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) [3] or maxillary sinus-membrane and deposition of metal shavings and bacterial contamination [4].…”
Section: Drills Burs Slow-oscillating Sawsmentioning
confidence: 99%