1997
DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.6.1759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination of Hospital Compressed Air with Nitric Oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the exhaled NO has been measured using different techniques producing widely different values. The main contributors to these differences are contamination either from nasopharynx production or from ambient NO levels (14,36). In our population, NO contamination from the nasopharynx was prevented by endotracheal intubation and NO contamination from compressed gas used to drive a positive-pressure ventilator was abolished by using filters that effectively scrubbed all NO from the compressed gas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the exhaled NO has been measured using different techniques producing widely different values. The main contributors to these differences are contamination either from nasopharynx production or from ambient NO levels (14,36). In our population, NO contamination from the nasopharynx was prevented by endotracheal intubation and NO contamination from compressed gas used to drive a positive-pressure ventilator was abolished by using filters that effectively scrubbed all NO from the compressed gas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…* There are higher levels of nasal or tracheal NO and NO output (V NO ) in patients with pneumonia. Organ dysfunctions were defined accordingly to the definition in the Logistic Organ Dysfunction system(36). † Values are expressed as mean Ϯ SE.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we have previously documented that inadvertent NO delivery due to contamination of hospital gas at levels parallel these ambient levels [12] and that ventilator-dependent subjects with normal lungs given inhaled NO between 2 ppb and 550 ppb demonstrate improved oxygenation [13]. Although this is an interesting observation, its clinical relevance is questionable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The available charcoal lter did not quantitatively remove NO (18). In the results presented, the hospital air concentrations of NO have been subtracted from the exhaled NO concentrations, resulting in a mean of 29.4 § 2.6% lower concentrations than those actually recorded (19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%