2011
DOI: 10.1086/657944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contamination of Hands with Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusafter Contact with Environmental Surfaces and after Contact with the Skin of Colonized Patients

Abstract: In a study of 40 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers, hand contamination was equally likely after contact with commonly examined skin sites and commonly touched environmental surfaces in patient rooms (40% vs 45%). These findings suggest that contaminated surfaces may be an important source of MRSA transmission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
109
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
109
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kramer et al reported that, in hospitals, surfaces with hand contact are often contaminated with nosocomial pathogens and may serve as vectors for cross-transmission (17). Stiefel et al found that in patient rooms with MRSA carriers, HCWs are just as likely to contaminate their hands or gloves from contact with commonly touched environmental surfaces as from direct contact with colonized patients (35). Boyce (6) demonstrated that nurses frequently acquired MRSA on their gloves after touching surfaces near colonized patients, and a report by Bhalla and others found that 53% of hand imprint cultures were positive for one or more pathogens after contact with surfaces near hospitalized patients (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kramer et al reported that, in hospitals, surfaces with hand contact are often contaminated with nosocomial pathogens and may serve as vectors for cross-transmission (17). Stiefel et al found that in patient rooms with MRSA carriers, HCWs are just as likely to contaminate their hands or gloves from contact with commonly touched environmental surfaces as from direct contact with colonized patients (35). Boyce (6) demonstrated that nurses frequently acquired MRSA on their gloves after touching surfaces near colonized patients, and a report by Bhalla and others found that 53% of hand imprint cultures were positive for one or more pathogens after contact with surfaces near hospitalized patients (2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, high-touch surfaces can also be colonized by the hands of health care workers. 5 Paradoxically, another mechanism for environmental spreading is the use of contaminated cleaning wipes. This phenomenon was described >40 years ago, 6 but it has generated more interest within recent years.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] Hand hygiene by patients may also be an important means to prevent acquisition and dissemination of health caree associated pathogens. 4,5 However, limited efforts have been made to engage patients in hand hygiene interventions. [6][7][8][9][10] LTCFs may pose unique challenges for implementation of patient hand hygiene initiatives for several reasons.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%