2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contaminant transport in soil: A comparison of the Theory of Porous Media approach with the microfluidic visualisation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a silica-based micromodel to visualize the transport of oocysts, the silica surfaces were selectively deposited with Fe 2 O 3 patches to simulate the charge heterogeneity of soil particles (Figure A) . Other researchers have developed different methods to coat the microfluidic channels with soil clays and natural organic matter . The effects of soil matrix, particle properties, hydrodynamic conditions, and biotic activities on colloidal transport can be directly observed.…”
Section: Microfluidics For Investigating Soil Interfacial Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a silica-based micromodel to visualize the transport of oocysts, the silica surfaces were selectively deposited with Fe 2 O 3 patches to simulate the charge heterogeneity of soil particles (Figure A) . Other researchers have developed different methods to coat the microfluidic channels with soil clays and natural organic matter . The effects of soil matrix, particle properties, hydrodynamic conditions, and biotic activities on colloidal transport can be directly observed.…”
Section: Microfluidics For Investigating Soil Interfacial Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soil micromodels have also been used to directly visualize the flow and transport of fluids and gases, including both single phase flow and multiphase flow. Single phase flow mainly addresses water flows in soil pores as well as the transport of soil nutrients and contaminants . Multiphase flow includes water (brine)oil (or nonaqueous phase liquids, NAPL) system, watergas system, and watergasoil system. , The impact of flow rates, pore geometries, wettability, and their interplay on the immiscible fluid displacement during imbibition or drainage can be precisely determined.…”
Section: Microfluidics For Investigating Soil Interfacial Processesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, however, spatially resolved studies have mostly focused on embedded samples and did not observe temporal evolution. Experiments in microfluidic flow channels (microchannels), coupled with optical microscopy and synchrotron X-ray spectroscopy, may allow us to bridge the gap between spatially and temporally resolved process-oriented geochemical studies in complex porous media. Although microchannels may not replicate the entire complexity of natural or engineered systems, their specifically reduced complexity allows us to disentangle the coupling between processes such as fluid–fluid and fluid–solid reactions under single and multiphase flow conditions. ,,, Microchannels are therefore well-suited for pore-scale investigations into phase formation and transformation in porous media.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To solve these equations, there are two different approaches, namely the analytical and the numerical approaches. Different numerical approaches, such as finite difference methods (FDM) [8], finite element methods (FEM) [9][10][11][12][13][14], finite volume methods (FVM) [15] and Meshfree methods including radial point collocation method (RPCM) [16,17], and radial base functions (RBFS) [18,19] can be utilised to solve the governing equation of the flow and solute transport in groundwater. The selection of the best method among these depends on site-specific needs, availability of input data, expectation and use of the model results, and the analytical solution can be used as a benchmark to show the accuracy of the numerical approach used, considering different conditions such as the aquifer's heterogeneity [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%