2020
DOI: 10.1109/tcyb.2018.2869706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Containment Control for General Second-Order Multiagent Systems With Switched Dynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a great deal of attention has been devoted to containment control of MASs, and thus obtained some important results [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In [6], containment problem was addressed for leader-follower MASs involving first-order dynamics in the presence of switching communication topologies.Containment of MASs involving second-order dynamics was investigated in [7], where only position information is used and velocity and acceleration information of all agents is unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, a great deal of attention has been devoted to containment control of MASs, and thus obtained some important results [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. In [6], containment problem was addressed for leader-follower MASs involving first-order dynamics in the presence of switching communication topologies.Containment of MASs involving second-order dynamics was investigated in [7], where only position information is used and velocity and acceleration information of all agents is unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [6], containment problem was addressed for leader–follower MASs involving first‐order dynamics in the presence of switching communication topologies.Containment of MASs involving second‐order dynamics was investigated in [7], where only position information is used and velocity and acceleration information of all agents is unavailable. For second‐order MASs with continuous‐time and discrete‐time dynamics, containment control law was proposed in [8] to deduce necessary and sufficient conditions. By virtue of a dynamic output approach, containment control for MASs with higher‐order dynamics was studied in [9], and a new observer‐type controller was designed on the basis of relative output information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After a review of the literature, the containment control problem can be categorized from different aspects such as agent dynamics, the leader maneuverer type, control protocol, sensor type, time delay, etc. With regard to agent dynamics, the containment control problem has been studied for multi‐agent systems with first‐order and second‐order integrators [1], general second‐order multi‐agent systems [2], high‐order multi‐agent systems [3], linear multi‐agent systems [4], and nonlinear multi‐agent systems [5]. With regard to the leader's trajectories, the containment control problem can be categorized into static and dynamic leader problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For distributed consensus-seeking, some appropriate distributed control strategies are adopted such that a group of autonomous agents asymptotically reach an agreement on a common value. The consensus-seeking problems have been intensively discussed from different perspectives including leaderless consensus (i.e., consensus without any leader) [5][6][7][8][9][10], leader-following consensus (i.e., consensus with a leader) [11][12][13][14][15], and containment control (i.e., consensus with multiple leaders) [16][17][18][19][20]. Note that the abovementioned references only address the consensus problems of multi-agent systems under continuous communication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%