2021
DOI: 10.1111/cod.13769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact urticaria caused by carmine‐containing eyeshadows; the causative allergen is carminic acid rather than CC38K

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 32 papers were screened by the FEEDAP Panel for their relevance in the assessment of the user safety for Carmine/carminic acid. Nineteen papers (Catli et al., 2015; De Pasquale et al., 2015; Gosetti et al., 2015; Liippo and Lammintausta, 2015; Miyakawa et al., 2016; Sanchez‐Machin et al., 2016; Ferris et al., 2017; Gulseren et al., 2017; Ramesh and Lieberman, 2017; Machler and Jacob, 2018; Takeo et al., 2018; Fok, 2020; Hirase et al., 2020; Lemoine et al., 2020; Morin and Sasseville, 2020; Ozceker et al., 2020; Suzuki et al., 2021; Warshaw et al., 2021; Sadowska et al., 2022) were considered by the FEEDAP Panel as relevant and confirmed that the additive should be considered as an allergen through dermal exposure. Only one single paper (Yamashita et al., 2018) reported negative effects of carmine tested for its skin sensitisation potential using a modified lymph node assay with an elicitation phase.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 32 papers were screened by the FEEDAP Panel for their relevance in the assessment of the user safety for Carmine/carminic acid. Nineteen papers (Catli et al., 2015; De Pasquale et al., 2015; Gosetti et al., 2015; Liippo and Lammintausta, 2015; Miyakawa et al., 2016; Sanchez‐Machin et al., 2016; Ferris et al., 2017; Gulseren et al., 2017; Ramesh and Lieberman, 2017; Machler and Jacob, 2018; Takeo et al., 2018; Fok, 2020; Hirase et al., 2020; Lemoine et al., 2020; Morin and Sasseville, 2020; Ozceker et al., 2020; Suzuki et al., 2021; Warshaw et al., 2021; Sadowska et al., 2022) were considered by the FEEDAP Panel as relevant and confirmed that the additive should be considered as an allergen through dermal exposure. Only one single paper (Yamashita et al., 2018) reported negative effects of carmine tested for its skin sensitisation potential using a modified lymph node assay with an elicitation phase.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%