1983
DOI: 10.1093/qmath/34.3.281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Unimodular Germs From the Plane to the Plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(and non-w.q.h.) map-germs f from the classifications in [14,15,51]. These results give upper bounds for dim M (K n , f ), and for certain f some of these upper bound will coincide with the following lower bound (which is analogous to Lemma 5.1 in the A p case).…”
Section: The Foliation Of K-orbits By K N -And K P -Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(and non-w.q.h.) map-germs f from the classifications in [14,15,51]. These results give upper bounds for dim M (K n , f ), and for certain f some of these upper bound will coincide with the following lower bound (which is analogous to Lemma 5.1 in the A p case).…”
Section: The Foliation Of K-orbits By K N -And K P -Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…And for each f λ = (xz + x y 2 + y 3 , yz, x 2 + y 3 + λz q ), λ ∈ C, the family f λ a = (xz + x y 2 + y 3 , yz, x 2 + ay 3 + λz q ) parameterizes the K n -orbits inside K · f λ . Example 6.4 Finally, consider the K-unimodal equidimensional maps of type G k,l,m from [14], given by f = (g 1 , g 2 ) = (x 2 + y k , x y l + y m ) = f 0 + (0, y m ), where k = 2(m −l) and either k ≤ l, l +1 < m < l +k −1 (case (a)) or l < k < 2l −1, k < m < 2l (case (b)). As above we check that the coefficient of (0, y m ) is a K n -modulus, hence dim M(K n , f ) ≥ 1.…”
Section: The Foliation Of K-orbits By K N -And K P -Orbitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, f p of f . Table 1 contains all map germs from the plane to the plane of Boardman symbol (2,2) given by Dimca and Gibson [9].…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computation shows that (x 3 + y 4 , x 2 y + y 4 ), denoted by X 1 is contact equivalent to g = (x 3 + x y 3 + y 4 , x 2 y + y 4 )+ terms of order ≥ 5. g has 4-jet (x 3 + x y 3 + y 4 , x 2 y + y 4 ), denoted by Q 4 . In the paper of Dimca and Gibson [9] it is proved (Lemma 3.6) that g is contact equivalent to its 4-jet (x 3 + x y 3 + y 4 , x 2 y + y 4 ). This implies that X 1 is contact equivalent to Q 4 .…”
Section: Typementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation