2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.08.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact pressures in the flexed hip joint during lateral trochanteric loading

Abstract: Acetabular fractures are an especially problematic outcome of motor vehicle side impacts. While fracture type has been correlated with impact direction and femoral orientation, actual contact pressures in the hip joint have not been quantified for lateral loading conditions. In the present study, we used pressure sensitive film to measure contact areas and pressures in seven hip joints from four cadavers under quasi-static lateral loading through the greater trochanter. The aim was to quantify the interactions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo studies show that the hip and knee joint experience significant contact forces of between 1 and 2 times bodyweight even in seemingly relaxed positions such as sitting and standing (Bergmann et al, 2001;Varadarajan et al, 2008). Further, equivalent contact stresses in these same joints have been estimated to be as much as 3-8 MPa (Thambyah et al, 2005;Sparks et al, 2005;Yoshida et al, 2006). In view of such physiological levels of stress we might ask whether such large and sustained contact stresses might make the joint tissues more susceptible to subsequent injury following a more dynamic or transient mode of loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo studies show that the hip and knee joint experience significant contact forces of between 1 and 2 times bodyweight even in seemingly relaxed positions such as sitting and standing (Bergmann et al, 2001;Varadarajan et al, 2008). Further, equivalent contact stresses in these same joints have been estimated to be as much as 3-8 MPa (Thambyah et al, 2005;Sparks et al, 2005;Yoshida et al, 2006). In view of such physiological levels of stress we might ask whether such large and sustained contact stresses might make the joint tissues more susceptible to subsequent injury following a more dynamic or transient mode of loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the natural incongruity of the femoral head with the acetabulum is lost and the cartilage-cartilage interface is replaced by a cartilage-synthetic interface, which limits extrapolation of these results to the natural hip (Hodge et al, 1986;Krebs et al, 1991;Macirowski et al, 1994). Pressure sensitive film has been used ex vivo (Afoke et al, 1987;Sparks et al, 2005), but it has a limited resolution and interferes substantially with contact mechanics because of its thickness (Wu et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No other measures of hip joint ROM were associated with PROs. Hip flexion ROM beyond 80° is considered to increase load at the anterior aspect of the acetabulum [31]. As the majority of chondrolabral lesions occur in the anterior acetabulum [22], greater flexion ROM may increase load on damaged articular surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%