2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact of myeloma cells induces a characteristic transcriptome signature in skeletal precursor cells –Implications for myeloma bone disease

Abstract: Physical interaction of skeletal precursors with multiple myeloma cells has been shown to suppress their osteogenic potential while favoring their tumor-promoting features. Although several transcriptome analyses of myeloma patient-derived mesenchymal stem cells have displayed differences compared to their healthy counterparts, these analyses insufficiently reflect the signatures mediated by tumor cell contact, vary due to different methodologies, and lack results in lineage-committed precursors. To determine … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a way, myeloma‐induced alterations of chromatin structure in BMSCs can be epigenetically propagated as a heritable memory regulating the transcriptional signature in the absence of continuous MM signals. Along with these observations, several analyses comparing the transcriptomic profile of BMSCs cocultured with MM cells and/or patient‐derived MM‐BMSCs to their healthy non‐myeloma counterparts have revealed clear differences . In this review, we discuss various chromatin‐based epigenetic mechanisms that contribute to osteogenic suppression and enhance adipogenic differentiation of BMSC progenitors in the context of MM bone disease (MMBD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a way, myeloma‐induced alterations of chromatin structure in BMSCs can be epigenetically propagated as a heritable memory regulating the transcriptional signature in the absence of continuous MM signals. Along with these observations, several analyses comparing the transcriptomic profile of BMSCs cocultured with MM cells and/or patient‐derived MM‐BMSCs to their healthy non‐myeloma counterparts have revealed clear differences . In this review, we discuss various chromatin‐based epigenetic mechanisms that contribute to osteogenic suppression and enhance adipogenic differentiation of BMSC progenitors in the context of MM bone disease (MMBD).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Herein, we investigated contact-induced receptors upon physical interaction of MM and bone cells. 20 We identified members of the junctional adhesion molecule (JAM) family and the chemokine receptor CXCR4 as contact-enhanced targets: first, 21 CXCR4 has been described as a useful theranostic target in MM patients; 22 second, JAM-A is associated with CXCR4; 23 and third, JAM-A was described to have an important role in hematopoietic stem cell biology. 24 These observations prompted us to investigate JAM-A in MM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are in accordance with the deregulation of bone metabolism in MM characterized by decreased osteoblast activity 1 . In a recent study, evaluating gene expression in skeletal precursor cells after 24 h co-culture with the MM cell line INA-6-altered transcriptome profiles of genes associated with bone metabolism, including Sema4D, were detected 24 . Indeed, MM cells seem to prevent osteoblast differentiation through a Sema4D-mediated mechanism 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%