2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10455-008-9112-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact metric manifolds with η-parallel torsion tensor

Abstract: We show that a non-Sasakian contact metric manifold with η-parallel torsion tensor and sectional curvatures of plane sections containing the Reeb vector field different from 1 at some point, is a (k, µ)-contact manifold. In particular for the standard contact metric structure of the tangent sphere bundle the torsion tensor is η-parallel if and only if M is of constant curvature, in which case its associated pseudo-Hermitian structure is CRintegrable. Next we show that if the metric of a non-Sasakian (k, µ)-con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this direction, Sharma [15] proved that if the metric g of K-contact manifold is a gradient soliton, then it is shrinking and the metric g is Einstein-Sasakian. This result has been generalised by Ghosh et al [12] for a (κ, μ)-space (see [3]). Moreover, Sharma-Ghosh [16] studied Sasakian 3-metric as a Ricci soliton and proved that it is expanding and homothetic to the standard Sasakian metric on the Heisenberg group nil 3 .…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this direction, Sharma [15] proved that if the metric g of K-contact manifold is a gradient soliton, then it is shrinking and the metric g is Einstein-Sasakian. This result has been generalised by Ghosh et al [12] for a (κ, μ)-space (see [3]). Moreover, Sharma-Ghosh [16] studied Sasakian 3-metric as a Ricci soliton and proved that it is expanding and homothetic to the standard Sasakian metric on the Heisenberg group nil 3 .…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Subtracting (35) from (33), using (12) and noting that Trl = 2nκ, it is immediate that (ϕX)Trl = 0, as n > 1. Taking ϕX instead of X and remembering that ξ Trl = 0…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Sharma [25], Ghosh et al [13] and Ghosh [12] obtained many interesting results regarding (gradient) Ricci solitons on (κ, μ)-contact metric manifolds. Moreover, gradient Ricci solitons on (κ, μ) -almost Kenmotsu manifolds were first studied by the present author jointly with De and Liu [27].…”
Section: Gradient Ricci Solitons On (κ μ)-Almost Cokähler Manifoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Sharma in [25] generalized Boyer and Galicki's result by proving that any complete K-contact manifold admitting a gradient Ricci soliton is a compact SasakiEinstein manifold. Moreover, non-K-contact (κ, μ)-contact metric manifolds admitting a gradient Ricci soliton were studied by Ghosh et al in [13]. For more related results regarding (gradient) Ricci solitons in the framework of contact metric manifolds, see Cho [8], Cho and Sharma [9] and Ghosh [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-contact metric manifolds have studied by several authors in the following papers [1,10,11,19] [13,20].…”
Section: Introduction:-mentioning
confidence: 99%