2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.g003460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Dynamics on Net Capturing of Tumbling Space Debris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the lumped mass model was concluded to be less accurate than the ANCF, the model was still validated using a parabolic net deployment experiment with 15% bounded average relative error for a coarse mesh. Furthermore, it was found to be more efficient, presenting a 15 times better computational efficiency than the ANCF model [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the lumped mass model was concluded to be less accurate than the ANCF, the model was still validated using a parabolic net deployment experiment with 15% bounded average relative error for a coarse mesh. Furthermore, it was found to be more efficient, presenting a 15 times better computational efficiency than the ANCF model [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To consider realistic scenarios, the misalignment tolerance between the net ejection direction and the direction to the center of the debris was investigated 17) and simulations of debris capture under tumbling conditions were carried out. 18) Ru et al 19) compared capabilities of various methods for modelling net systems, being alternative to the traditional mass-spring-damper models. One of them is the "absolute nodal coordinates formulation (ANCF)," used by Shan et al 20) It was shown that the ANCF model was able to describe the flexibility of the net, while preventing penetration of the cables into the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%