2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.protcy.2016.01.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Angle Measurement on Medical Implant Titanium Based Biomaterials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown in our previous study similar contact angle values 80–100° obtained for unpolished rough selective laser melted titanium fabricated with energy densities as high as 150 J/mm 3 [ 49 ]. The contact angle of fabricated discs was at least tens of degrees higher than for titanium alloys fabricated conventionally [ 46 , 50 , 51 ]. Minimizing the contact angle and maximizing the surface energy is recognized as beneficial for obtaining biomaterials that promote cell response [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have shown in our previous study similar contact angle values 80–100° obtained for unpolished rough selective laser melted titanium fabricated with energy densities as high as 150 J/mm 3 [ 49 ]. The contact angle of fabricated discs was at least tens of degrees higher than for titanium alloys fabricated conventionally [ 46 , 50 , 51 ]. Minimizing the contact angle and maximizing the surface energy is recognized as beneficial for obtaining biomaterials that promote cell response [ 52 , 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the implant wettability under physiological conditions, SBF was used instead of DI H 2 O during contact angle goniometry (Tan et al, 2012b). Both Ti and PS surfaces are considered hydrophilic, as they have water contact angles are <90° (Zeiger et al, 2013; Strnad et al, 2016). Coating these implants with ECM proteins seems to enhance their hydrophilicity, with a greater effect seen in the plasma-facilitated coatings (from 65° to 25°) (Figure 3A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is influenced by the surface topography of sample, which determines its hydrophilic or hydrophobic nature. For implant materials, a hydrophilic surface is considered to be desirable in view of its better interaction with biological fluids, cells and tissues [29,30]. Figure 3 presents the X-ray diffractograms: (a) Ti-35Nb_Control, and (b) Ti-35Nb_4h.…”
Section: Contact Angle Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%