2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2017.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle as function of surface roughness of different wood species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The contact angle mean value 100 ± 9º of birch wood veneers was the highest among the investigated three kinds of un-treated wood species and exceeded 90º that indicates the hydrophobicity of material itself. It means that there is low surface wettability, Papp [16] points out that un-treated birch (Betulapendula Roth.) contact angle is 72º.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contact angle mean value 100 ± 9º of birch wood veneers was the highest among the investigated three kinds of un-treated wood species and exceeded 90º that indicates the hydrophobicity of material itself. It means that there is low surface wettability, Papp [16] points out that un-treated birch (Betulapendula Roth.) contact angle is 72º.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decrease in wettability of untreated specimens after AWT can be attributed to the increasing in the surface roughness of wood due to swelling and shrinkage, and to the migration of non-polar extractives induced by AWT [37,38]. On the opposite, AWT determined an increase of wettability of thermo-treated specimens.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existem outras formas para se realizar essa medição com baixo custo, que utiliza câmera digital, plataforma para o substrato, softwares de fácil acesso (STALDER et al, 2006) e iluminação apropriada, além de uma seringa de precisão, que apresentam resultados aceitáveis e próximos aos equipamentos especializados (THAKKER et al, 2013;STALDER et al, 2006 onde , e representam as tensões de líquido-vapor, sólido-vapor e sólido-líquido, respectivamente, e é o ângulo de contato A equação (1) é chamada de Equação de Young (DE GENNES, 1985;YUAN;LEE, 2013). No caso do método da gota séssil, é preferível que a gota possua pequeno volume para que a influência da gravidade seja mínima, dessa forma a gota tende a assumir formato esférico (THAKKER et al, 2013;DE GENNES, 1985 (NUSSBAUM, 1995;NUSSBAUM, 1999;PAPP;CSIHA, 2017;SHUPE et al, 2001). Hse (1972)…”
Section: Introductionunclassified