1996
DOI: 10.1016/0892-6875(96)00064-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle and surface analysis studies of sphalerite particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are limited studies on contact angle measurement for sulfide and nonsulfide minerals to illustrate domains of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity under a variety of conditions involving pH, collectors, and depressants [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are limited studies on contact angle measurement for sulfide and nonsulfide minerals to illustrate domains of hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity under a variety of conditions involving pH, collectors, and depressants [15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, those methods are often found to be inadequate when dealing with porous solid particles (Prestidge and Tsatouhas, 2000;Buckton et al, 1995). Capillary rise techniques have also been proposed (Quere, 1997;Siebold et al, 1997Siebold et al, , 2000Subrahmanyam et al, 1996;Wolfrom et al, 2002) but always with some limitations such as the structure of the solids bed inside the capillary, the experimental requirements, the accuracy, the unknown solids structure inside the bed, its porosity, and many others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The range of the early stage of penetration was neglected since it is governed by inertial forces with very fast rates of liquid uptake, expanding the range of calculations beyond 150 s results in high errors in contact angle determination due to increasing deviation from linearity, Table 1 shows contact angles of four iron ores calculated by formula (1). [11][12][13] . …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%