2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.176
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact angle and free surface energy of CdS films on polystyrene substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The relevant calculations were performed using the Owens-Wendt equation. [33,34] The surface properties of the supporting substrates significantly affect the polymorphs and crystalline structures of the film growth process. [10,14,[28][29][30] Thus, we first confirmed the surface morphological structures through AFM analysis of 40-nm-thick CuPc films on the substrates with different inert molecular configurations on the surfaces, i.e., the comparative bare case and the ODTS and HMDS cases shown in Figures 2a-c, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The relevant calculations were performed using the Owens-Wendt equation. [33,34] The surface properties of the supporting substrates significantly affect the polymorphs and crystalline structures of the film growth process. [10,14,[28][29][30] Thus, we first confirmed the surface morphological structures through AFM analysis of 40-nm-thick CuPc films on the substrates with different inert molecular configurations on the surfaces, i.e., the comparative bare case and the ODTS and HMDS cases shown in Figures 2a-c, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface energies (γ s s) of the supporting substrates and the DNTT or p ‐6P layers were determined by measuring the contact angles (θ) of water and diiodomethane as two probe liquids, by using a contact‐angle analyzer (Phoenix 300A, SEO Co., Inc.). The γ s values were calculated by fitting the Owens–Wendt equation: [ 33,34 ] 1+cosθγlv=2γnormalsdγlvd+2γnormalspγlvp where γ s and γ lv represent the surface energies of the target surface and the probe liquid, respectively, and the superscripts d and p refer to the dispersive and polar (nondispersive) terms, respectively. The surface morphologies of the p ‐6P and CuPc films were measured via atomic force microscopy (AFM, Digital Instruments Multimode) over a 5 × 5 µm 2 scan area.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a single CdS material is often insufficient for practical photocatalytic applications. This is due to the lack of wettability [12], dye adsorption properties and aggregation of CdS nanomaterials [13], which will lead to a decrease of photoactivity [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the calculations, it was observed that the presence of Ag interlayer between the TCO layers had an important effect on the SFE properties of the sandwich films. In addition, the work of adhesion (W a ) values between TCOs and Ag interlayer were estimated using the calculated SFE values of each interlayer based on the Dupré, Fowkes and Girifalco-Good equations [50][51][52][53][54][55]. The results obtained by using surface thermodynamics approaches were also supported with various characterization methods such as XRD, AFM, and SEM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%