2002
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2002.8611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Contact Angle and Film Pressure: Study of a Talc Surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coefficient f = s S /H S = 0.45 is recommended in [99]. It follows from Table 3 that for modified sorbents f = 0.41-0.63.…”
Section: Low-energy Surfaces Of the Organic Derivatives Of Oxides Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The coefficient f = s S /H S = 0.45 is recommended in [99]. It follows from Table 3 that for modified sorbents f = 0.41-0.63.…”
Section: Low-energy Surfaces Of the Organic Derivatives Of Oxides Andmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…6.18c to express the interfacial enthalpy H s SL in terms of the apolar (LW), Lewis acid (A) and Lewis base (B) components of the surface enthalpy for the solid and immersional liquid, the final explicit form for the enthalpy of immersion is as follows [42][43][44]:…”
Section: Hydrophilic-hydrophobic Series and Harkins-jura Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of the related surface enthalpy terms H s S0 and H s LG from direct calorimetry measurements provides an alternative way to evaluate the hydrophobichydrophilic character of a solid surface [38,[42][43][44], since the following deconvolution procedures may be proposed for the surface enthalpy in analogy with those holding for the Gibbs energy (Eqs. 6.8-6.13a, 6.13b):…”
Section: Calorimetry Applied To Evaluate Surface Properties Of Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its analysis shows that both hydrophilic and hydrophobic materials in interaction with water are characterized by a single coefficient f = 2/3 » 0.67. It is almost 1.5 times higher the value f = 0.45 used in [44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Douillard [34,44,55] tried to get round this problem by using the approximate linear equation DG = fDH and assigning values of 0.3-0. 45 to the coefficient f during determination of the free energy of wetting.…”
Section: Heats Of Wetting and Surface Energy Of Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%