2021
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption of sugar‐sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages and breast cancer survival

Abstract: Background The activation of insulin pathways is hypothesized to promote tumor growth and worsen breast cancer survival. Sugar‐sweetened beverages (SSBs) can lead to a higher risk of insulin resistance and may affect survival. The authors prospectively evaluated the relation of postdiagnostic SSB and artificially sweetened beverage (ASB) consumption with mortality among women with breast cancer. Methods In total, 8863 women with stage I through III breast cancer were identified during follow‐up of the Nurses' … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII, we previously observed that four components of the DRRD [dietary glycemic index (14), red and processed meat (15), coffee (16), and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB; ref. 17)] were associated with risk of mortality following breast cancer, while no association was found for whole fruit intake (18). However, no studies to date have evaluated the association between adherence to the whole DRRD [as measured by the DRRD score (13)] and survival outcomes after breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII, we previously observed that four components of the DRRD [dietary glycemic index (14), red and processed meat (15), coffee (16), and sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB; ref. 17)] were associated with risk of mortality following breast cancer, while no association was found for whole fruit intake (18). However, no studies to date have evaluated the association between adherence to the whole DRRD [as measured by the DRRD score (13)] and survival outcomes after breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…higher risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality in relation to high consumption of fruit juice and sugar-sweetened beverages as well as total carbohydrate after breast cancer diagnosis. [2][3][4] According to our findings, dietary carbohydrate intake influenced the risk of mortality in women with breast cancer disproportionately depending on the source and type of carbohydrate; whereas carbohydrate from vegetables was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, carbohydrate from fruit juice was linked with a higher risk of breast cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. 5 However, it is unclear what role protein and fat intake plays in breast cancer survival in relation to carbohydrate consumption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Numerous epidemiologic studies have shown an association between sugar and breast cancer ( Table 1 ) [ 46 , 47 ]. Additionally, sucrose intake during adolescence [ 48 ] was significantly correlated with higher percentage of dense breast volume [ 49 ], a known risk factor for breast cancer [ 50 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Farvid at al. [ 46 ] examined 8863 women with stage I to III breast cancer who were part of the Nurses’ Health Study and found that women who had SSB consumption after diagnosis greater than zero to one serving per week had higher breast-cancer-specific mortality (>1 to 3 servings per week: HR = 1.31 [95% CI, 1.09–1.58]; >3 servings per week: HR = 1.35 [95% CI, 1.12–1.62]; P trend = 0.001) and all-cause mortality (>1 to 3 servings per week: HR = 1.21 [95% CI, 1.07–1.37]; >3 servings per week: HR = 1.28 [95% CI, 1.13–1.45]; P trend = 0.0001). In addition, replacing SSBs with coffee (18%) or tea (15%) reduced breast-cancer-specific mortality, and coffee (19%), tea (17%), or water (9%) lowered all-cause mortality risk [ 46 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%