2013
DOI: 10.4236/fns.2013.41009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Consumption of Dairy and Metabolic Syndrome Risk in a Convenient Sample of Mexican College Applicants

Abstract:

The rise in metabolic syndrome (MetS) is accompanied by a decrease in milk and dairy consumption and an increase in sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption, with SSB possibly displacing dairy products in the diet. Our main objective was to determine whether young individuals not meeting the dairy recommendations of 3 servings per day were at greater risk for MetS. In a cross-sectional design, a food frequency questionnaire was answered by Mexican college applicants (n Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, a dairy intake of less than 2 servings a week was a risk factor for MetS. This result concurred with findings from Mexican, European, and Middle Eastern populations in which individuals with a higher dairy consumptions had a lower prevalence of MetS [ 38 , 39 ][ 40 ][ 41 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In our study, a dairy intake of less than 2 servings a week was a risk factor for MetS. This result concurred with findings from Mexican, European, and Middle Eastern populations in which individuals with a higher dairy consumptions had a lower prevalence of MetS [ 38 , 39 ][ 40 ][ 41 ]…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Twenty two reports were excluded after carefully reading the full texts ( Supplementary Table S1 ). Finally, a total of 23 publications, including 15 cross-sectional studies 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 , one case-control study 27 and seven prospective cohort studies 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 were included in this meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 35 studies including 12 cohort studies [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 ] with 40,943 subjects and 9436 cases and 25 cross-sectional [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 25 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ] studies with 362,196 subjects were included in meta-analyses of the highest versus the lowest dairy product consumption and risk of MetS ( Figure 1 ). Table 3 presents the characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural logarithm of the RRs from the original study were combined through using the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models, which incorporate both within- and between-study variations [ 16 ]. If the original study did not report the lowest level as a reference, we recalculated the RR and its 95% CI [ 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. When a study reports the results of normal weight at base line and overweight or obese at baseline, we first combined the two results using a fixed-effect model to obtain an overall estimate before combining with other studies [ 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation